ArticleCureus2024
Changes in Emergency Department Utilization in Vulnerable Populations After COVID-19 Shelter-in-Place Orders.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Utilization of mental health services during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic - a systematic review and meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Changes in Emergency Department Utilization in Vulnerable Populations After COVID-19 Shelter-in-Place Orders.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to compare emergency department (ED) utilization and admission rates for patients with a history of mental health (MH) disorders, substance use disorders (SUDs), and social determinants of health (SDOH) before and after implementing COVID-19 shelter-in-place (SIP) orders.
methodsThis was a retrospective, multicenter study leveraging electronic medical record (EMR) data from 20 EDs across a large Midwest integrated healthcare system from 5/2/2019 to 12/31/2019 (pre-SIP) and from 5/2/2020 to 12/31/2020 (post-SIP). Diagnoses were documented in the patient's medical records. Poisson and logistic regression models were used to evaluate ED utilization and admission rate changes.
resultsA total of 871,020 ED encounters from 487,028 unique patients were captured. Overall, 2,572 (0.53%) patients had a documented Z code for SDOH. Patients with previously diagnosed MH disorders or SUDs were more likely to seek ED care after the SIP orders were implemented (risk ratio (RR): 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-1.22, p<0.001), as were patients with SDOH (RR: 2.37, 95% CI: 2.19-2.55, p<0.001). Patients with both previously diagnosed MH disorders or SUDs and a documented SDOH had even higher ED utilization (RR: 3.31, 95% CI: 2.83-3.88, p<0.001) than those with either condition alone. Patients with MH disorders and SUDs (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.86-0.92, p<0.001) or SDOH (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54-0.83, p<0.001) were less likely to be admitted post-SIP orders, while patients with a history of diseases of physiologic systems were more likely to be admitted.
conclusionVulnerable populations with a history of MH disorders, SUDs, and SDOH experienced increased ED utilization but a lower rate of hospital admissions after the implementation of SIP orders. The findings highlight the importance of addressing these needs to mitigate the impact of public health crises on these populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.