ArticleCureus2024
Cryobiopsy for Secondary Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secondary pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (SPAP) is one of the diffuse parenchymal lung diseases, and the utility and safety of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) for diagnosing SPAP are unknown. A case of SPAP diagnosed by TBLC is presented. Specimens that were useful for diagnosis were collected, and there was no adverse event following TBLC. The usefulness of TBLC for interstitial lung disease has been widely reported, but there are few reports of SPAP. We present the clinical course of TBLC in the diagnosis of SPAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.