ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Identifying therapeutic targets for breast cancer: insights from systematic Mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic evidence for causal roles of circulating proteins on breast cancer susceptibility.iScience · 2026Article
- Identification of biomarkers and potential drug targets for esophageal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Investigating the role of cathepsins in breast cancer progression: a Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) exhibits a high incidence rate, imposing a substantial burden on healthcare systems. Novel drug targets are urgently needed for BC. Mendelian randomization (MR) has gained widespread application for identifying fresh therapeutic targets. Our endeavor was to pinpoint circulatory proteins causally linked to BC risk and proffer potential treatment targets for BC. Methods: Through amalgamating protein quantitative trait loci from 2,004 circulating proteins and comprehensive genome-wide association study data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, we conducted MR analyses. Employing Steiger filtering, bidirectional MR, Bayesian colocalization, phenotype scanning, and replication analyses, we further solidified MR study outcomes. Additionally, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was harnessed to unveil latent associations between proteins and prevailing breast cancer medications. The phenome-wide MR (Phe-MR) was employed to assess potential side effects and indications for the druggable proteins of BC. Finally, we further affirmed the drugability of potential drug targets through mRNA expression analysis and molecular docking. Results: Through comprehensive analysis, we identified five potential drug targets, comprising four (TLR1, A4GALT, SNUPN, and CTSF) for BC and one (TLR1) for BC_estrogen receptor positive. None of these five potential drug targets displayed reverse causation. Bayesian colocalization suggested that these five latent drug targets shared variability with breast cancer. All drug targets were replicated within the deCODE cohort. TLR1 exhibited PPI with current breast cancer therapeutic targets. Furthermore, Phe-MR unveiled certain adverse effects solely for TLR1 and SNUPN. Conclusion: Our study uncovers five prospective drug targets for BC and its subtypes, warranting further clinical exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.