ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2024
The Reverse Dual Plane: A Novel Technique for Endoscopic Transaxillary Breast Augmentation.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast Augmentation with Inferior Muscular Support: The Indication, Technique Evolution, and Outcomes.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Commentary on: The Reverse Dual Plane: A Novel Technique for Endoscopic Transaxillary Breast Augmentation.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Quite a few Asian patients prefer axillary incision for breast augmentation. However, this surgery needs improvement. Objectives: To introduce a reverse dual-plane technique through a transaxillary approach and compare it with a transaxillary dual-plane approach. Methods: Eighty-two patients were divided into Group A ( Results: The NPRS scores of Group B patients were significantly lower than those of Group A patients ( Conclusions: Compared with Tebbetts' dual plane, this procedure significantly reduced pain, improved breast softness, and eliminated BAD, without increasing complications. Level of Evidence 4:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.