Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38887076›Full record

SynthesisActa orthopaedica2024

Total joint arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Rasmus Liukkonen, Venla-Linnea Karjalainen, Reetta Kvist, Matias Vaajala, Ville Ponkilainen, Teemu Karjalainen

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta orthopaedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Total Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty Using the Uncemented HORUSJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rasmus LiukkonenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere.
Venla-Linnea KarjalainenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere.
Reetta KvistCentral Finland Central Hospital Nova, Jyväskylä.
Matias VaajalaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere.
Ville PonkilainenCentral Finland Central Hospital Nova, Jyväskylä.
Teemu KarjalainenCentral Finland Central Hospital Nova, Jyväskylä; Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Tampere University Hospital Tampere, Finland. teemukarjalainen@me.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) is increasingly treated with total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits and harms of the TJA for thumb CMC OA compared with other treatment strategies. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe performed a systematic search on MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases on August 2, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of TJA in people with thumb CMC joint OA regardless of the stage or etiology of the disease or comparator. The outcomes were pooled with a random effect meta-analysis.

resultsWe identified 4 studies randomizing 420 participants to TJA or trapeziectomy. At 3 months, TJA's benefits for pain may exceed the clinically important difference. However, after 1-year follow-up TJA does not improve pain compared with trapeziectomy (mean difference 0.53 points on a 0 to 10 scale; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.81). Furthermore, it provides a transient benefit in hand function at 3 months (measured with Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, scale 0-100, lower is better) compared with trapeziectomy with or without ligament reconstruction tendon interposition. The benefit in function diminished to a clinically unimportant level at 1-year follow-up (4.4 points better; CI 0.42-8.4).

conclusionTransient benefit in hand function for TJA implies that it could be a preferable option over trapeziectomy for people who consider fast postoperative recovery important. However, current evidence fails to inform us if TJA carries long-term higher risks of revisions compared with trapeziectomy.

Indexed as

Carpometacarpal JointsOsteoarthritisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicThumbArthroplasty, ReplacementHumansTrapezium Bone

Identifiers

PMID38887076
PMCPMC11184324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.