Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886980›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2024

A kinetic analysis of four high velocity, horizontally focused step-up variations for acceleration training.

Daniel J Glassbrook, Chris A Dorman, Tim L A Doyle, Jarrod A Wade, Joel T Fuller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of sport science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel J GlassbrookFaculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3317-8791
Chris A DormanSouth Sydney Rabbitohs Rugby League Club, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tim L A DoyleFaculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1227-6835
Jarrod A WadeSouth Sydney Rabbitohs Rugby League Club, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Joel T FullerFaculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-4878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Step-up variations are frequently used in sports performance to develop coordinated and powerful movements that transfer to running. This study aimed to quantify the kinetic characteristics of the first foot contact of four different step-up variations. Ten professional rugby league players participated in this study and performed the Barbell One Box Step-Up with Catch (BB1), Barbell Two Box Step-Up (BB2), Vest Two Box Run (VEST) and Step-Up Jump (JUMP) as part of routine in-season strength training sessions during one season. Peak force, total impulse and maximal rate of force development (RFD) were measured from first foot contact on the step-up box. Significantly greater peak force and RFD were observed in JUMP than any other variation (standardized mean difference; SMD: 3.9-5.5; p < 0.001). Total impulse was equal between JUMP and BB1, and significantly greater in JUMP than BB2 and VEST (SMD: 1.3-2.3; p < 0.001), and in BB1 than BB2 and VEST (SMD: 1.8-2.8; p < 0.001). Significantly larger peak force and RFD were observed in BB2 and VEST than BB1 (SMD: 0.6-0.7) and in total impulse in BB2 than VEST (SMD: 1.6) (p < 0.05). The results of this study highlight that step-up exercise variations maximize different kinetic characteristics, which may transfer differently to athlete running performance.

Indexed as

AccelerationAthletic PerformanceFootballRunningAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFootHumansKineticsMaleResistance TrainingYoung Adultforceimpulserate of force developmentstrength trainingvelocity

Identifiers

PMID38886980
PMCPMC11295083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.