ReviewActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2025
Knowledge graphs in psychiatric research: Potential applications and future perspectives.
Review in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- WiseMind: a knowledge-guided multi-agent framework for accurate and empathetic psychiatric diagnosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Large language model powered knowledge graph construction for mental health exploration.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Knowledge graphs in psychiatric research: Potential applications and future perspectives.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2025Review
- Phenotyping to predict 12-month health outcomes of older general medicine patients.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Knowledge graph and its application in the study of neurological and mental disorders.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
- Knowledge graph for traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment of diabetic retinopathy: design, construction, and applications.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKnowledge graphs (KGs) remain an underutilized tool in the field of psychiatric research. In the broader biomedical field KGs are already a significant tool mainly used as knowledge database or for novel relation detection between biomedical entities. This review aims to outline how KGs would further research in the field of psychiatry in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs).
methodsWe conducted a thorough literature review across a spectrum of scientific fields ranging from computer science and knowledge engineering to bioinformatics. The literature reviewed was taken from PubMed, Semantic Scholar and Google Scholar searches including terms such as "Psychiatric Knowledge Graphs", "Biomedical Knowledge Graphs", "Knowledge Graph Machine Learning Applications", "Knowledge Graph Applications for Biomedical Sciences". The resulting publications were then assessed and accumulated in this review regarding their possible relevance to future psychiatric applications.
resultsA multitude of papers and applications of KGs in associated research fields that are yet to be utilized in psychiatric research was found and outlined in this review. We create a thorough recommendation for other computational researchers regarding use-cases of these KG applications in psychiatry.
conclusionThis review illustrates use-cases of KG-based research applications in biomedicine and beyond that may aid in elucidating the complex biology of psychiatric illness and open new routes for developing innovative interventions. We conclude that there is a wealth of opportunities for KG utilization in psychiatric research across a variety of application areas including biomarker discovery, patient stratification and personalized medicine approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.