Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886834›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2024

Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI): a modified Delphi study.

Stephanie K Brewer, Catherine M Corbin, Ana A Baumann, Shannon Wiltsey Stirman, Janine M Jones, Michael D Pullmann, Aaron R Lyon, MODIFI Expert Panel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephanie K BrewerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74Th St, Suite 100, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA. sbrewer1@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5699-5121
Catherine M CorbinSchool of Special Education, School Psychology, and Early Childhood Studies, College of Education, University of Florida, Norman Hall, Room 1801, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2674-4425
Ana A BaumannDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 600 S. Taylor Ave, Attn: Ana Bauman, MSC:8100-0094-02, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4523-0147
Shannon Wiltsey StirmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, 795 Willow Rd. (NC-PTSD), Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9917-5078
Janine M JonesCollege of Education, University of Washington, Miller Hall 322 S, Campus, Box 353600, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3537-557X
Michael D PullmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74Th St, Suite 100, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-864X
Aaron R LyonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74Th St, Suite 100, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3657-5060
MODIFI Expert Panel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntervention adaptation is often necessary to improve the fit between evidence-based practices/programs and implementation contexts. Existing frameworks describe intervention adaptation processes but do not provide detailed steps for prospectively designing adaptations, are designed for researchers, and require substantial time and resources to complete. A pragmatic approach to guide implementers through developing and assessing adaptations in local contexts is needed. The goal of this project was to develop Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI), a method for intervention adaptation that leverages human centered design methods and is tailored to the needs of intervention implementers working in applied settings with limited time and resources.

methodMODIFI was iteratively developed via a mixed-methods modified Delphi process. Feedback was collected from 43 implementation research and practice experts. Two rounds of data collection gathered quantitative ratings of acceptability and inclusion (Round 1) and feasibility (Round 2), as well as qualitative feedback regarding MODIFI revisions analyzed using conventional content analysis.

resultsIn Round 1, most participants rated all proposed components as essential but identified important avenues for revision which were incorporated into MODIFI prior to Round 2. Round 2 emphasized feasibility, where ratings were generally high and fewer substantive revisions were recommended. Round 2 changes largely surrounded operationalization of terms/processes and sequencing of content. Results include a detailed presentation of the final version of the three-step MODIFI method (Step 1: Learn about the users, local context, and intervention; Step 2: Adapt the intervention; Step 3: Evaluate the adaptation) along with a case example of its application. DISCUSSION: MODIFI is a pragmatic method that was developed to extend the contributions of other research-based adaptation theories, models, and frameworks while integrating methods that are tailored to the needs of intervention implementers. Guiding teams to tailor evidence-based interventions to their local context may extend for whom, where, and under what conditions an intervention can be effective.

Identifiers

PMID38886834
PMCPMC11181660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.