Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886790›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2024

Combined HRAS and NRAS ablation induces a RASopathy phenotype in mice.

Rocío Fuentes-Mateos, Rósula García-Navas, Cristina Fernández-Infante, Luis Hernández-Cano, Nuria Calzada-Nieto, Andrea Olarte-San Juan, Carmen Guerrero, Eugenio Santos, Alberto Fernández-Medarde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. KRAS: the Achilles' heel of pancreas cancer biology.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rocío Fuentes-MateosCentro de Investigación del Cáncer-Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer (CSIC-Universidad de Salamanca) and CIBERONC, Campus Unamuno, University of Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Rósula García-NavasCentro de Investigación del Cáncer-Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer (CSIC-Universidad de Salamanca) and CIBERONC, Campus Unamuno, University of Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Cristina Fernández-InfanteInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer (IMBCC), USAL-CSIC. Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Luis Hernández-CanoInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer (IMBCC), USAL-CSIC. Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Nuria Calzada-NietoCentro de Investigación del Cáncer-Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer (CSIC-Universidad de Salamanca) and CIBERONC, Campus Unamuno, University of Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Andrea Olarte-San JuanCentro de Investigación del Cáncer-Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer (CSIC-Universidad de Salamanca) and CIBERONC, Campus Unamuno, University of Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Carmen GuerreroInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer (IMBCC), USAL-CSIC. Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Eugenio SantosCentro de Investigación del Cáncer-Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer (CSIC-Universidad de Salamanca) and CIBERONC, Campus Unamuno, University of Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain. esantos@usal.es.
Alberto Fernández-MedardeCentro de Investigación del Cáncer-Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer (CSIC-Universidad de Salamanca) and CIBERONC, Campus Unamuno, University of Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain. afm@usal.es.

Funding

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer CB16/12/00352Consejería de Educación, Junta de Castilla y León SA264P18Fundación Científica Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer EPAEC222641CICSFundación Ramón Areces CIVP19A5942Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI22/0153Junta de Castilla y León CLC-2017-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHRAS

methodsEight double knockout and eight control mice were analyzed using micro-X-ray computerized tomography and a Small Animal Physiological Monitoring system. Tissues and samples from these mice were analyzed using standard histological and Molecular Biology methods and the significance of the results analyzed using a Student´s T-test.

resultsThe very few double knockout mice surviving up to adulthood display clear craniofacial abnormalities reminiscent of those seen in RASopathy mouse models, as well as thrombocytopenia, bleeding anomalies, and reduced platelet activation induced by thrombin. These surviving mice also present heart and spleen hyperplasia, and elevated numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the spleen. Mechanistically, we observed that these phenotypic alterations are accompanied by increased KRAS-GTP levels in heart, platelets and primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts from these animals.

conclusionsOur data uncovers a new, previously unidentified mechanism capable of triggering a RASopathy phenotype in mice as a result of the combined removal of HRAS and NRAS.

Indexed as

GTP PhosphohydrolasesMice, KnockoutPhenotypeProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)AnimalsMembrane ProteinsMiceMonomeric GTP-Binding ProteinsPlatelet ActivationSpleenGTP PhosphohydrolasesHras protein, mouseMembrane ProteinsMonomeric GTP-Binding ProteinsNras protein, mouseProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Developmental disordersHRAS;NRAS ablationRAS isoformsRASopathyThrombocytopenia

Identifiers

PMID38886790
PMCPMC11184836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.