Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886755›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

SCANPatient: study protocol for a multi-centre, batched, stepped wedge, comparative effectiveness, randomised clinical trial of synoptic reporting of computerised tomography (CT) scans assessing cancers of the pancreas.

Lin Li, Jessica Kasza, Ariadna Recasens, Liane Ioannou, Elysia Greenhill, Neil Merrett, David Cavallucci, Samantha Ellis, Helen Madgwick, Hyun Soo Ko and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Lin LiSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4764-1679
Jessica KaszaSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ariadna RecasensSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Liane IoannouSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Elysia GreenhillSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Neil MerrettDepartment of Surgery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David CavallucciDepartment of Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Samantha EllisDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Helen MadgwickCRP Consumer Reference Group, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Hyun Soo KoDepartment of Cancer Imaging, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lorraine ChantrillDepartment of Medical Oncology, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Benjamin LovedayDepartment of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Mehrdad NikfarjamDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Daniel CroaghDepartment of Surgery, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jessica YangDepartment of Radiology, Concord Hospital, Concord, NSW, Australia.
Andrew DwyerSA Node National Imaging Facility, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
John ZalcbergSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Charles PilgrimCancer Research Program, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 5, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. Charles.Pilgrim@monash.edu.
SCANPatient Authorship Group

Funding

MRFF-NHMRC MRF2015163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplete surgical removal of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is central to all curative treatment approaches for this aggressive disease, yet this is only possible in patients technically amenable to resection. Hence, an accurate assessment of whether patients are suitable for surgery is of paramount importance. The SCANPatient trial aims to test whether implementing a structured synoptic radiological report results in increased institutional accuracy in defining surgical resectability of non-metastatic PDAC.

methodsSCANPatient is a batched, stepped wedge, comparative effectiveness, cluster randomised clinical trial. The trial will be conducted at 33 Australian hospitals all of which hold regular multi-disciplinary team meetings (MDMs) to discuss newly diagnosed patients with PDAC. Each site is required to manage a minimum of 20 patients per year (across all stages). Hospitals will be randomised to begin synoptic reporting within a batched, stepped wedge design. Initially all hospitals will continue to use their current reporting method; within each batch, after each 6-month period, a randomly selected group of hospitals will commence using the synoptic reports, until all hospitals are using synoptic reporting. Each hospital will provide data from patients who (i) are aged 18 or older; (ii) have suspected PDAC and have an abdominal CT scan, and (iii) are presented at a participating MDM. Non-metastatic patients will be documented as one of the following categories: (1) locally advanced and surgically unresectable; (2) borderline resectable; or (3) anatomically clearly resectable (Note: Metastatic disease is treated as a separate category). Data collection will last for 36 months in each batch, and a total of 2400 patients will be included. DISCUSSION: Better classifying patients with non-metastatic PDAC as having tumours that are either clearly resectable, borderline or locally advanced and unresectable may improve patient outcomes by optimising care and treatment planning. The borderline resectable group are a small but important cohort in whom surgery with curative intent may be considered; however, inconsistencies with definitions and an understanding of resectability status means these patients are often incorrectly classified and hence overlooked for curative options.

trial registrationThe SCANPatient trial was registered on 17th May 2023 in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) (ACTRN12623000508673).

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalComparative Effectiveness ResearchMulticenter Studies as TopicPancreatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTomography, X-Ray ComputedAustraliaHumansPancreatectomyPredictive Value of TestsComputerised tomography (CT) scansPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)Randomised controlled trialResectabilitySynoptic reporting

Identifiers

PMID38886755
PMCPMC11181632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.