Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886709›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024

A comparative analysis of sivelestat sodium hydrate and ulinastatin combination therapy in the treatment of sepsis with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Jian Xu, Chenfei Zhang, Keren Wu, Yanhua Qian, Wei Hu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07118930 (Prospective Double-Blind Controlled Study of Sivelestat Sodium in the Perioperative Management of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07118930 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Double-Blind Controlled Study of Sivelestat Sodium in the Perioperative Management of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

TypeinterventionalSponsorAffiliated Hospital of Nantong UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled62ConditionsCoronary Heart Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)ArmsSivelestat Sodium injection 2 h after OPCABG for 72 h, Saline (0.9% NaCl)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jian Xu *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Wuxi Fifth Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214000, Jiangsu, China.
Chenfei Zhang *Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, Zhejiang, China.
Keren Wu *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the 904 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Wuxi, 214000, Jiangsu, China.
Yanhua QianDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Wuxi Fifth Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214000, Jiangsu, China. Qianyanhua9025@163.com.
Wei HuDepartment of Pharmacy, the 904 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, No. 101, Xingyuan Road, Liangxi District, Wuxi, 214000, Jiangsu, China. huwei202312@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis comparative analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy of Sivelestat Sodium Hydrate (SSH) combined with Ulinastatin (UTI) in the treatment of sepsis with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

methodsA control group and an observation group were formed with eighty-four cases of patients with sepsis with ARDS, with 42 cases in each group. The control group was intravenously injected with UTI based on conventional treatment, and the observation group was injected with SSH based on the control group. Both groups were treated continuously for 7 days, and the treatment outcomes and efficacy of both groups were observed. The Murray Lung Injury Score (MLIS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) were compared. Changes in respiratory function, inflammatory factors, and oxidative stress indicators were assessed. The occurrence of adverse drug reactions was recorded.

resultsThe total effective rate in the observation group (95.24%) was higher than that in the control group (80.95%) (P < 0.05). The mechanical ventilation time, intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization time, and duration of antimicrobial medication in the observation group were shorter and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome incidence was lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The mortality rate of patients in the observation group (35.71%) was lower than that in the control group (52.38%), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). MLIS, SOFA, and APACHE II scores in the observation group were lower than the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, respiratory function, inflammation, and oxidative stress were improved in the observation group (P < 0.05). Adverse reactions were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05).

conclusionThe combination of SSH plus UTI improves lung injury and pulmonary ventilation function, and reduces inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with sepsis and ARDS.

Indexed as

Drug Therapy, CombinationGlycineGlycoproteinsRespiratory Distress SyndromeSepsisSulfonamidesAdultAgedAPACHEFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Organ FailureOrgan Dysfunction ScoresGlycineGlycoproteinssivelestatSulfonamidesTrypsin InhibitorsurinastatinAdverse reactionsInflammationOxidative stressRespiratory functionSepsis with acute respiratory distress syndromeSivelestat sodium hydrateTherapeutic efficacyUlinastatin

Identifiers

PMID38886709
PMCPMC11184757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.