Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886691›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Barriers and facilitators to uptake and persistence on prep among key populations in Southern Province, Zambia: a thematic analysis.

Kirsten Stoebenau, Godfrey Muchanga, Sacha St-Onge Ahmad, Chiti Bwalya, Mwangala Mwale, Samara Toussaint, Choolwe Maambo, Carson J Peters, Caitlin Baumhart, Linah K Mwango and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kirsten StoebenauUniversity of Maryland College Park, 4200 Valley Drive, College Park, MD, 20742-2611, USA. kstoeben@umd.edu.
Godfrey MuchangaMaryland Global Initiatives Corporation Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Sacha St-Onge AhmadUniversity of Maryland College Park, 4200 Valley Drive, College Park, MD, 20742-2611, USA.
Chiti BwalyaUniversity of Maryland College Park, 4200 Valley Drive, College Park, MD, 20742-2611, USA.
Mwangala MwaleMaryland Global Initiatives Corporation Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Samara ToussaintUniversity of Maryland College Park, 4200 Valley Drive, College Park, MD, 20742-2611, USA.
Choolwe MaamboMaryland Global Initiatives Corporation Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Carson J PetersUniversity of Maryland College Park, 4200 Valley Drive, College Park, MD, 20742-2611, USA.
Caitlin BaumhartCenter for International Health, Education, and Biosecurity, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Linah K MwangoCiheb Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Marie-Claude C LavoieDivision of Global Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cassidy W ClaassenMaryland Global Initiatives Corporation Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Funding

ZENITH D43 HIV & Aging Supplement - Prevalence of aging related conditions, stigma, and quality of life among older adults with and without HIV infection in ZambiaD43TW012493 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Cassidy W. Claassen, Lloyd Berdard Mulenga · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW012493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEspecially in high HIV prevalence contexts, such as Zambia, effective biomedical prevention tools are needed for priority populations (PPs), including key populations (KPs), who are at higher risk. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been scaled up nationally in Zambia, but little is known about barriers to PrEP use among specific PPs to date.

methodsTo understand barriers and facilitators to PrEP use in Zambia, we conducted a qualitative case study of PrEP services to PPs including sero-discordant couples (SDCs), female sex workers (FSWs), and men who have sex with men (MSM) in Livingstone. The study conducted in 2021 included in-depth interviews (n = 43) guided by the socio-ecological model, and focus group discussions (n = 4) with clinic and community-based providers and PrEP-eligible clients including users and non-users across PP groups. We used thematic analysis to analyze data using codes derived both deductively and inductively.

resultsWe found multilevel barriers and facilitators to PrEP use. Cross-cutting barriers shared across PP groups included amplifying effects of PrEP being mistaken for antiretroviral drugs used to treat HIV, including anticipated stigma, and concerns about side-effects based on both misinformation and experience. In addition, stigmatized identities, particularly that of MSM, served as a barrier to PrEP use. The fear of being mislabeled as having HIV was of greatest concern for FSWs. Facilitators to PrEP use primarily included the importance of confidential, KP-sensitive services, and the role of informed, supportive family, friends, and peers. Participants across all PP groups urged expanded education efforts to increase awareness of PrEP within the general population toward mitigating concerns of being mislabeled as living with HIV.

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study of the PrEP cascade among multiple PPs in Zambia. This study provides important explanation for the low rates of PrEP continuation found in earlier demonstration trials among KPs in Zambia. The study also offers recommendations for programming efforts going forward such as inclusive PrEP awareness campaigns, expanded KP sensitivity training, and related efforts to thwart PrEP stigma while expanding access.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisQualitative ResearchSex WorkersAdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHomosexuality, MaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareAnti-HIV AgentsFemale sex workersHIVMen who have sex with menPrEPSero-discordant couplesZambia

Identifiers

PMID38886691
PMCPMC11184712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.