ReviewNature medicine2024
Women's health and rights in the twenty-first century.
Review in Nature medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- 'Putting profit over people': Australian women's perceptions of the economic and commercial systems shaping women's health and social inequities.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Global Patterns and Temporal Trends in Modifiable Risk Factors Among Women of Childbearing Age, 1990-2021: A Systematic Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Healthy behaviors awareness and the knowledge-practice gap among pregnant university students: an explanatory sequential study on quality of life and support services.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Prenatal therapies: a Points to Consider framework for responsible innovation.BMC medical genomics · 2025Review
- Agency in Family Planning: A Scoping Review of the Measurement of Agency in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
- The economics of investing in women and health.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- The impact of implementing the women's reproductive rights agenda on climate change.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Galvanizing and sustaining momentum are critical to improve maternal nutrition in South Asia.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Citizen science as an instrument for women's health research.Nature medicine · 2024Article
- Anger's moderating influence on the relationship between victimization and perpetration of domestic violence and abuse in patients suffering from severe mental illness. Insights from a cross sectional study using moderated mediation analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the twenty-first century, the complex relationship between women's health and rights has been influenced by a range of interconnected challenges, including gender inequity, reproductive health disparities, maternal mortality and morbidity, and women's inability to access life-saving, high-quality healthcare services including family planning. Going forward, the world needs to find ways to implement the unfinished agenda of the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) 1994 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), thus prioritizing health and rights for women and girls as essential not only to their survival but also to their progress, agency and empowerment. It is also important to consider the interconnection between women's health and rights and climate change, with its disproportionate impact on the well-being of girls and women, and to address the impact and opportunities afforded by digital technologies. By embracing a holistic approach, societies might be able to advance the cause of women's health and rights in a more inclusive and sustainable manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38886622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.