Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886508›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2025

Addressing gaps and enhancing experiences in support services for families of pediatric cancer survivors.

Verena Paul, Laura Inhestern, Désirée Sigmund, Jana Winzig, Stefan Rutkowski, Gabriele Escherich, Corinna Bergelt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Patient-reported and caregiver-reported outcomes after limb salvage or amputation for pediatric bone and soft tissue sarcomas: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. What Matters Most: The Top 10 Child and Adolescent Cancer Research Priorities in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Verena PaulDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. v.paul@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4459-1773
Laura InhesternDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Désirée SigmundDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Jana WinzigDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan RutkowskiDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Gabriele Escherich *Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Corinna Bergelt *Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood cancer's enduring challenges extend beyond primary therapy. Diverse medical and psychosocial services are available to assist families in follow-up care. This interview study sought to gain a thorough understanding of family motives, satisfaction levels, and barriers to utilization.

methodsThe design of this cross-sectional study involves a qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews. We interviewed parents of minor cancer survivors within the first 5 years after primary treatment.

resultsSurvivors readily accessed medical support services when necessary. While parents expressed overall satisfaction with the available services, there was a notable gap in their knowledge regarding appropriate psychosocial and family-orientated services. Barriers to access included geographical distances, time constraints, and the absence of childcare options.

conclusionThere are familial challenges and burdens that fall outside the scope of conventional care services. Tailoring services to family-centered needs, providing more information and easier access to interventions might help to reduce barriers. IMPACT: Existing need notwithstanding, families did not frequently utilize psychosocial services as they did medical ones. Identified barriers included lack of awareness, limited availability, long distances, and scheduling conflicts. While many studies primarily focus on adult patients or young adults, the present study examines the gaps and strengths in follow-up care for pediatric cancer survivors and their families. By acknowledging and addressing the unique challenges and strengths of families with pediatric cancer survivors, we can lead to a more tailored and effective follow-up approach that can enhance their overall well-being by minimizing barriers and providing targeted support.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsSurvivorsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleParentsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID38886508
PMCPMC12411228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.