Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886501›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Mechanical evaluation of soil and artisanal bricks for quality masonry product management, Limpopo South Africa.

George Oluwole Akintola, Francis Amponsah-Dacosta, Sphiwe Emmanuel Mhlongo, Khensani Eullen Matsiketa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

George Oluwole AkintolaDepartment of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering, and Agriculture, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou, 0950, Limpopo Province, South Africa. georgeakintola540@gmail.com.
Francis Amponsah-DacostaDepartment of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering, and Agriculture, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou, 0950, Limpopo Province, South Africa.
Sphiwe Emmanuel MhlongoDepartment of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering, and Agriculture, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou, 0950, Limpopo Province, South Africa.
Khensani Eullen MatsiketaDepartment of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering, and Agriculture, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou, 0950, Limpopo Province, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selection of raw materials to produce quality artisanal bricks is imperative for sustainable building in rural regions. Artisanal brick-making process often employs traditional kiln to fire brick because it is an affordable, and applicable technology in the rural region. However, there are noticeable cracks, increasing among buildings constructed with artisanal bricks from the rural region in South Africa. In response, this study aims to evaluate the soil and artisanal brick specimens to understand the suitability of the raw materials and quality of products in the study area. A total of twenty soil samples and twenty-seven artisanal burnt bricks were collected from three different artisanal brick-making sites designated as Site A, B, and C. In all samples, the geotechnical tests revealed a sandy loam soil type with a predominance of chlorite clay minerals and non-clay minerals. Furthermore, the sand-size particles depict a relatively higher proportion compared to clay-size particles. Besides, Atterberg's limit test plotted above the A-line of the plasticity chart indicates an inorganic clay of low plasticity with a low to medium compressibility property. Based on the empirical workability and mechanical tests, most of the studied soils are suitable for optimum and acceptable extrusion bricks and suitable for an on-site single-story construction based on SANS 227:2007 standards.

Indexed as

Artisanal bricksMechanical evaluationQuality masonrySoil

Identifiers

PMID38886501
PMCPMC11183125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.