Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886498›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Desensitizing efficacy of a universal dentin adhesive containing mesoporous bioactive glass on dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical trial with a split-mouth model.

Hyun-Jung Kim, Soram Oh, Jiyoung Kwon, Kyoung-Kyu Choi, Ji-Hyun Jang, Duck-Su Kim

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hyun-Jung Kim *Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, 24 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemoon-gu, Seoul, 02453, South Korea.
Soram Oh *Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, 24 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemoon-gu, Seoul, 02453, South Korea.
Jiyoung KwonDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, South Korea.
Kyoung-Kyu ChoiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, 24 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemoon-gu, Seoul, 02453, South Korea.
Ji-Hyun JangDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, 24 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemoon-gu, Seoul, 02453, South Korea. jangjihyun@khu.ac.kr.
Duck-Su KimDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, 24 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemoon-gu, Seoul, 02453, South Korea. dentist96@khu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This split-mouth blinded randomized controlled study compared the efficacy of a desensitizing agent with oxalate/resin polymer and a universal adhesive containing mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG) for dentin hypersensitivity (DH) relief, using Schiff sensitivity score (SSS) and visual analog scale (VAS). Split quadrants containing teeth with DH were treated with either MS Coat ONE or Hi-Bond Universal with MBG as the functional additive. Assessments at baseline, immediately post-application, and at 1- and 2-week follow-ups used standardized stimulus protocols (air, cold, and acid). The SSS difference was the primary outcome, while the VAS difference was the secondary outcome. A mixed linear effect model performed statistical analysis. Immediate DH reduction occurred in response to air stimuli, with a significant decrease in Group HB than in Group MS (p = 0.0178). Cold stimulus reduction exhibited a gradual cumulative effect, with consistently greater reductions in Group HB than in Group MS (p ≤ 0.0377). Both groups effectively managed acidic stimuli, with no significant differences (p > 0.05). The VAS scores decreased gradually over the follow-up period (p < 0.0001). This study highlights the differential efficacy of treatments for various DH triggers and recommends specific approaches based on different stimulus types. The universal adhesive containing MBG demonstrated DH relief potential, promising efficacy identical to or superior to that of a dedicated desensitizing agent. Further research exploring the long-term efficacy and underlying mechanisms is warranted. The universal adhesive containing MBG can be adopted as an in-office desensitizing agent for DH relief. The desensitizing efficacy of universal adhesive matches or surpasses dedicated agents for air and cold stimuli.

Indexed as

Dentin Desensitizing AgentsDentin SensitivityAdultCeramicsDental CementsFemaleGlassHumansMaleMiddle AgedPorosityTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultDental CementsDentin Desensitizing AgentsDentin hypersensitivityDesensitizing agentMesoporous bioactive glassRandomized clinical studySplit-mouth designUniversal adhesive

Identifiers

PMID38886498
PMCPMC11183245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.