ArticleScientific reports2024
Calibration of contact parameters of sandy soil for planting tiger nut based on non-linear tools.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Calibration of soil contact parameters for planting sand shrubs in the desert regions of Inner Mongolia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A methodology combining physical experiments with simulation was employed to acquire contact parameters of sandy soil precisely for planting tiger nuts in the desert area of Xinjiang. The stacking angle under different parameter combinations was applied as a response value. Through the Plackett-Burman test, several factors that have a significant influence were determined. The steepest ascent test was conducted to establish the finest scope of values for these parameters. The stacking angle was considered the response variable, and non-linear tools were used to optimize these parameters for simulation. The findings showed that applying response surface methodology (RSM) resulted in a relative error of 1.24%. In the case of BP-GA, the relative error compared to the physical test value was 0.34%, while for BP, it was 2.18%. After optimization using Wavelet Neural Network (WNN), the relative error was reduced to only 0.15%. Results suggest that WNN outperforms the RSM model, and the sandy soil model and parameters generated using WNN can be effectively utilized for discrete element simulation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.