ArticleScientific reports2024
Outcomes and factors associated with prolonged stays among patients admitted to adult intensive care unit in a resource-limited setting: a multicenter chart review.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Time to maternal death and its predictors among obstetric ICU patients in a resource-limited setting: A 10-year survival analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- ICU Readmission and In-Hospital Mortality Rates for Patients Discharged from the ICU-Risk Factors and Validation of a New Predictive Model: The Worse Outcome Score (WOScore).Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Biocide Tolerance, Biofilm Formation, and Efflux Pump Activity in Clinical Isolates ofInfectious disease reports · 2025Article
- Comparative effectiveness of monotherapy vs. combination therapy for postoperative central nervous system infections in neurosurgical patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The length of stay in an intensive care unit is used as a benchmark for measuring resource consumption and quality of care and predicts a higher risk of readmission. The study aimed to assess the outcome and factors associated with prolonged intensive care unit stays among those admitted to adult intensive care units of selected public hospitals in Addis Ababa from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. A multicenter retrospective chart review was conducted involving 409 adult patients. Binary logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with a prolonged stay and chi-square tests were used to assess associations and differences in outcomes for prolonged stays. The study, involving 409 of 421 individuals, revealed a predominantly male (55.0%) and the median age of study participants was 38, with an interquartile range (27, 55). Approximately 16.9% experienced prolonged stays, resulting in a 43.5% mortality rate. After adjustments for confounders, there were significant associations with prolonged stays for sedative/hypnotics, readmission, and complications. The study revealed that for every six patients admitted to the intensive care unit, one patient stayed longer, with nearly half experiencing mortality, demanding increased attention. The study emphasized the critical need for improvement in addressing associations between sedative/hypnotics, readmissions, complications, and prolonged stays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.