ArticleScientific reports2024
Advanced optical assessment and modeling of extrusion bioprinting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- After the Nozzle: Post-Printing Maturation, Failure Modes, and Use-Point Assessment of Cell-Laden Extrusion-Bioprinted Hydrogel Constructs.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine-Learning-Enabled Hydrogel Biosensors for Wearable Health Monitoring.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Purpose-Adaptable Reinforced 3D Hyaluronic-Acid Based Platform to Study Pathomechanisms of the Central Nervous System.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Bioprinting Organs-Science or Fiction?-A Review From Students to Students.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Parameter Optimisation in 3D Extrusion Printing of Polyhydroxybutyrate Using Design of Experiment Methodology.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Fibrillar Bundles as Fibrous Filler Materials for Attaining Cell Anisotropy in Bioprinting.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Task-specific computational fluid dynamics evaluation of multi-outlet extrusion nozzles for bioprinting.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Informed Hydrogel Biomaterials in Additive Manufacturing.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Engineering Extracellular Microenvironments: The Impact of Fibrous Materials on Cell Behavior.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing cancer care: Bioprinting prostate cancer stem cells for targeted treatments.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- A Versatile Method to Produce Monomodal Nano- to Micro-Fiber Fragments as Fillers for Biofabrication.Small methods · 2025Article
- Droplet-based bioprinting.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025Article
- Commercially available bioinks and state-of-the-art lab-made formulations for bone tissue engineering: A comprehensive review.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the context of tissue engineering, biofabrication techniques are employed to process cells in hydrogel-based matrices, known as bioinks, into complex 3D structures. The aim is the production of functional tissue models or even entire organs. The regenerative production of biological tissues adheres to a multitude of criteria that ultimately determine the maturation of a functional tissue. These criteria are of biological nature, such as the biomimetic spatial positioning of different cell types within a physiologically and mechanically suitable matrix, which enables tissue maturation. Furthermore, the processing, a combination of technical procedures and biological materials, has proven highly challenging since cells are sensitive to stress, for example from shear and tensile forces, which may affect their vitality. On the other hand, high resolutions are pursued to create optimal conditions for subsequent tissue maturation. From an analytical perspective, it is prudent to first investigate the printing behavior of bioinks before undertaking complex biological tests. According to our findings, conventional shear rheological tests are insufficient to fully characterize the printing behavior of a bioink. For this reason, we have developed optical methods that, complementarily to the already developed tests, allow for quantification of printing quality and further viscoelastic modeling of bioinks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.