Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886406›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2024

Breast cancer survivors' opinion on personalizing endocrine therapy and developing informative tools.

Elie Rassy, Chiara Benvenuti, Sarra Akla, Antonio Di Meglio, Elise Martin, Julie Havas, André Rieutord, David Combarel, Léonor Fasse, Florian Scotté and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Elie Rassy *Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Chiara Benvenuti *Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Sarra AklaMedical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Antonio Di MeglioMedical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Elise MartinSurvivorship Program, INSERM Unit U981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Julie HavasSurvivorship Program, INSERM Unit U981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
André RieutordPharmacy Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
David CombarelDepartment of Pharmacology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Léonor FasseInterdisciplinary Patient Pathway Division, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Florian ScottéInterdisciplinary Patient Pathway Division, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Laure Guéroult AccolasMon réseau cancer du sein, Paris, France.
Guillemette JacobLes Seintinelles, Paris, France.
Anne BergougnouxOdyssea Foundation, Paris, France.
Suzette DelalogeMedical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2106-9165
Ines Vaz-LuisMedical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7194-2260
Barbara PistilliMedical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. barbara.pistilli@gustaveroussy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9184-7199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding breast cancer survivors' perspectives is critical to personalizing endocrine therapy (ET) in the adjuvant setting. A nationwide survey among breast cancer survivors was proposed in France, in collaboration with patient advocacy organizations, to assess their perspectives on personalizing ET and developing dedicated informative tools. This survey explored patients' preferences regarding ET intake schedule, formulation, presentation (color, taste, shape, size, design, and packaging), combination with agents targeting ET-related adverse events, and a mobile application to support them during ET. Of the 1103 individuals who started the survey, 939 (85.1%) were eligible for enrollment and completed the survey. The majority of the participants considered that a personalized ET should take into consideration the intake schedule (n = 974, 90.7%) and swallowable tablet formulation (n = 606, 64.5%), without a preference for ET presentation (n = 619; 65.9%). The majority of the participants expressed a willingness to participate in a potential clinical trial evaluating the combination of ET with agents targeting ET-related adverse events at the start of ET (n = 752, 80.1%) or in the case of major ET-related adverse events (n = 778, 82.8%). The primary considerations were to have an uncompromised ET efficacy and a guaranteed reduction of adverse events. Last, a dedicated mobile application was considered helpful by 665 participants (70.8%). Informative tools should focus on the recommendations for dealing with adverse events (n = 593, 63.2%), the impact on the patient's daily life (n = 515, 54.9%), benefits (n = 504, 53.7%), and adverse events (n = 494, 52.6%) of ET. This survey paves the way for multimodal strategies that can include a personalized ET (e.g., ET in combination with agents targeting ET-related adverse events) and dedicated mobile applications to ultimately improve adherence.

Identifiers

PMID38886406
PMCPMC11183231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.