ArticleScientific reports2024
CACSNet for automatic robust classification and segmentation of carotid artery calcification on panoramic radiographs using a cascaded deep learning network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Calcifications on Panoramic Radiographs: A Meta-analysis.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning and Radiomics in Extracranial Carotid Plaque Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Detection of carotid artery calcifications using artificial intelligence in dental radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Atherosclerosis diagnosis from magnetic resonance images: an empirical approach to automate carotid vessel wall segmentation and feature-based prediction.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Reliability of the QUADAS-2 checklist in AI-based medical imaging: A comparison of human reviewers and ChatGPT-4o.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
- Side- and patient-based performance of a deep learning system based on the results of individual detection of carotid artery calcifications on panoramic radiographs.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Architectures for Automatic Tooth Segmentation in Panoramic Dental Radiographs: Balancing Accuracy and Computational Efficiency.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Area detection improves the person-based performance of a deep learning system for classifying the presence of carotid artery calcifications on panoramic radiographs.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of deep learning-based segmentation models for carotid artery calcification detection in panoramic radiographs.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Dental Panoramic Radiographs as Opportunistic Screening for Carotid Calcifications: A Case-Based Review.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke is one of the major causes of death worldwide, and is closely associated with atherosclerosis of the carotid artery. Panoramic radiographs (PRs) are routinely used in dental practice, and can be used to visualize carotid artery calcification (CAC). The purpose of this study was to automatically and robustly classify and segment CACs with large variations in size, shape, and location, and those overlapping with anatomical structures based on deep learning analysis of PRs. We developed a cascaded deep learning network (CACSNet) consisting of classification and segmentation networks for CACs on PRs. This network was trained on ground truth data accurately determined with reference to CT images using the Tversky loss function with optimized weights by balancing between precision and recall. CACSNet with EfficientNet-B4 achieved an AUC of 0.996, accuracy of 0.985, sensitivity of 0.980, and specificity of 0.988 in classification for normal or abnormal PRs. Segmentation performances for CAC lesions were 0.595 for the Jaccard index, 0.722 for the Dice similarity coefficient, 0.749 for precision, and 0.756 for recall. Our network demonstrated superior classification performance to previous methods based on PRs, and had comparable segmentation performance to studies based on other imaging modalities. Therefore, CACSNet can be used for robust classification and segmentation of CAC lesions that are morphologically variable and overlap with surrounding structures over the entire posterior inferior region of the mandibular angle on PRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.