Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886325›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2024

Postoperative analgesic consumption for primary versus first repeat Cesarean delivery: a historical cohort study.

Romel Holmes, Jong Ok La, Matthew Fuller, Ashraf S Habib

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Romel HolmesDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Jong Ok LaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Matthew FullerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Ashraf S HabibDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Women's Anesthesia, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3094, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. ashraf.habib@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6980-1856

Funding

Non-US Government Research Support
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt is unclear if postoperative pain experience and opioid consumption differ in patients undergoing primary vs repeat Cesarean delivery (CD) as prior studies have yielded conflicting results and none used the same patients as their own controls. We sought to compare opioid consumption and pain scores in patients undergoing both a primary and a first repeat CD, using the same patients as their own controls.

methodsWe conducted a single-centre historical cohort study of patients who underwent both a primary and a first repeat CD under neuraxial anesthesia between 1 January 2016 and 30 November 2022. The same standardized multimodal analgesic regimen was used for all patients. The primary outcome was opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME) at 48 hr after surgery. Secondary outcomes included area under the curve for pain scores at 24 and 48 hr, and opioid consumption at 24 hr.

resultsWe included 409 patients. In unadjusted analysis, there were no significant differences between primary and repeat CD in median [interquartile range] opioid consumption at 48 hr (45 [15-89] mg vs 45 [15-83] mg OME) or in any of the secondary outcomes. In the multivariable model adjusting for age, body mass index, anxiety, depression, priority, surgery duration, gestational age, receipt of postoperative ketorolac, and neuraxial type, repeat CD was still not associated with increased opioid consumption compared with primary CD (adjusted rate ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.51).

conclusionIn this retrospective study, we found no differences in postoperative opioid consumption or reported pain scores in patients who underwent both a primary and a first repeat CD.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCesarean SectionPostoperative PainAdultCesarean Section, RepeatCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPain MeasurementPregnancyRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, Opioidanalgesic consumptionCesarean deliveryobstetricsopioidspain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.