Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886246›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2024

Artificial Intelligence Modeling and Priapism.

Edoardo Pozzi, David A Velasquez, Alexandra Aponte Varnum, Bruce R Kava, Ranjith Ramasamy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edoardo PozziDesai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. pozzi.edoardo@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0228-7039
David A VelasquezDesai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0475-4918
Alexandra Aponte VarnumDesai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6212-3158
Bruce R KavaDesai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Ranjith RamasamyDesai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1387-7904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis narrative review aims to outline the current available evidence, challenges, and future perspectives of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the diagnosis and management of priapism, a condition marked by prolonged and often painful erections that presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. RECENT

findingsRecent advancements in AI offer promising solutions to face the challenges in diagnosing and treating priapism. AI models have demonstrated the potential to predict the need for surgical intervention and improve diagnostic accuracy. The integration of AI models into medical decision-making for priapism can also predict long-term consequences. AI is currently being implemented in urology to enhance diagnostics and treatment work-up for various conditions, including priapism. Traditional diagnostic approaches rely heavily on assessments based on history, leading to potential delays in treatment with possible long-term sequelae. To date, the role of AI in the management of priapism is understudied, yet to achieve dependable and effective models that can reliably assist physicians in making decisions regarding both diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePriapismHumansMaleArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningPriapism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.