ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2024
Sampling Strategies for Experimentally Mapping Molecular Fitness Landscapes Using High-Throughput Methods.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Empirical studies of genotype-phenotype-fitness maps of proteins are fundamental to understanding the evolutionary process, in elucidating the space of possible genotypes accessible through mutations in a landscape of phenotypes and fitness effects. Yet, comprehensively mapping molecular fitness landscapes remains challenging since all possible combinations of amino acid substitutions for even a few protein sites are encoded by an enormous genotype space. High-throughput mapping of genotype space can be achieved using large-scale screening experiments known as multiplexed assays of variant effect (MAVEs). However, to accommodate such multi-mutational studies, the size of MAVEs has grown to the point where a priori determination of sampling requirements is needed. To address this problem, we propose calculations and simulation methods to approximate minimum sampling requirements for multi-mutational MAVEs, which we combine with a new library construction protocol to experimentally validate our approximation approaches. Analysis of our simulated data reveals how sampling trajectories differ between simulations of nucleotide versus amino acid variants and among mutagenesis schemes. For this, we show quantitatively that marginal gains in sampling efficiency demand increasingly greater sampling effort when sampling for nucleotide sequences over their encoded amino acid equivalents. We present a new library construction protocol that efficiently maximizes sequence variation, and demonstrate using ultradeep sequencing that the library encodes virtually all possible combinations of mutations within the experimental design. Insights learned from our analyses together with the methodological advances reported herein are immediately applicable toward pooled experimental screens of arbitrary design, enabling further assay upscaling and expanded testing of genotype space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38886207What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.