Trial reportThe oncologist2024
Entinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory abdominal neuroendocrine tumors.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03211988 (A Phase 2 Single-Arm Multicenter Study of Entinostat in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Abdominal Neuroendocrine), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2 Single-Arm Multicenter Study of Entinostat in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Abdominal Neuroendocrine (NE) Tumors
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Neuroendocrine tumours through an epigenetic lens: Emerging insights for diagnosis and treatment.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Review
- Survival Outcomes in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Progression-Related Endpoints.Cancers · 2026Review
- Systematic design of combination therapy by targeting master regulators of coexisting diffuse midline glioma cell states.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Review
- Systematic identification and targeting of master regulator checkpoints (MRC) governing tumor microenvironment-mediated immune evasion.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Review
- Dual Targeting EZH2 and Histone Deacetylases in Human Uterine Sarcoma Cells Under Both 2D and 3D Culture Conditions.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Identification and targeting of regulators of SARS-CoV-2-host interactions in the airway epithelium.Science advances · 2025Article
- Basic science and translational implications of current knowledge on neuroendocrine tumors.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
- Current Status of Immunotherapy in Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare neoplasms with an increasing annual incidence and prevalence. Many are metastatic at presentation or recur following surgical resection and require systemic therapy, for which somatostatin analogs such as octreotide or lanreotide comprise typical first-line therapies. Nonetheless, treatment options remain limited. Epigenetic processes such as histone modifications have been implicated in malignant transformation and progression. In this study, we evaluated the anti-proliferative effects of a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, entinostat, which was computationally predicted to show anti-cancer activity, as confirmed in in vitro and in vivo models of GEP-NETs.
methodsThis was a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of entinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory abdominal NETs. The primary objective was to estimate the objective response rate to entinostat. Additionally, with each patient as his/her own control we estimated the rates of tumor growth prior to enrollment on study and while receiving entinostat. Patients received 5 mg entinostat weekly until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The dose could be changed to 10 mg biweekly for patients who did not experience grade ≥ 2 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in cycle 1, but was primarily administered at the starting 5 mg weekly dose.
resultsThe study enrolled only 5 patients due to early termination by the drug sponsor. The first patient that enrolled had advanced disease and died within days of enrollment before follow-up imaging due to a grade 5 AE unrelated to study treatment and was considered non-evaluable. Best RECIST response for the remaining 4 patients was stable disease (SD) with time on study of 154+, 243, 574, and 741 days. With each patient as his/her own control, rates of tumor growth on entinostat were markedly reduced with rates 17%, 20%, 33%, and 68% of the rates prior to enrollment on study. Toxicities possibly or definitely related to entinostat included grade 2/3 neutrophil count decrease [2/4 (50%)/ 2/4 (50%)], grade 3 hypophosphatemia [1/4, (25%)], grade 1/2 fatigue [1/4 (25%)/ 2/4 (50%)], and other self-limiting grade 1/2 AEs.
conclusionIn the treatment of relapsed or refractory abdominal NETs, entinostat 5 mg weekly led to prolonged SD and reduced the rate of tumor growth by 32% to 83% with an acceptable safety profile (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03211988).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.