Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886159›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2024

Entinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory abdominal neuroendocrine tumors.

Jacob K Jamison, Mengxi Zhou, Edward P Gelmann, Lyndon Luk, Susan E Bates, Andrea Califano, Tito Fojo

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03211988 (A Phase 2 Single-Arm Multicenter Study of Entinostat in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Abdominal Neuroendocrine), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03211988 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Phase 2 Single-Arm Multicenter Study of Entinostat in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Abdominal Neuroendocrine (NE) Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorAntonio FojoRan2017 to 2021Enrolled5ConditionsNeuroendocrine TumorsArmsEntinostat
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jacob K JamisonWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1171-065X
Mengxi ZhouDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Edward P GelmannUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Lyndon LukDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Susan E BatesDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Andrea CalifanoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Tito FojoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

Systematic pharmacological targeting of the core mechanisms responsible for maintaining cancer cell stateU54CA209997 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA, HONIG, BARRY H · 2016 to 2021
$10.9M
Studying the evolution of drug resistance in prostate cancer at the single cell levelU54CA274506 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DIANA MURRAY · 2023 to 2026
$9.1M
Systematic Identification and Pharmacological Targeting of Tumor Dependencies for Precision Cancer MedicineU01CA217858 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA · 2017 to 2021
$6.1M
Elucidating and Targeting tumor dependencies and drug resistance determinants at the single cell levelU01CA272610 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ANDREA CALIFANO · 2022 to 2026
$4.8M
High-performance compute cluster for biomedical computingS10OD012351 · OD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA · 2012 to 2012
$2.0M
High Performance Computing Cluster for Biomedical ResearchS10OD032433 · OD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA · 2023 to 2023
$2.0M
Storage System for High Performance ComputingS10OD021764 · OD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA · 2016 to 2016
$600k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA217858NCI NIH HHS U01 CA272610NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209997NCI NIH HHS U54 CA274506NIH HHS S10 OD012351NIH HHS S10 OD021764NIH HHS S10 OD032433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare neoplasms with an increasing annual incidence and prevalence. Many are metastatic at presentation or recur following surgical resection and require systemic therapy, for which somatostatin analogs such as octreotide or lanreotide comprise typical first-line therapies. Nonetheless, treatment options remain limited. Epigenetic processes such as histone modifications have been implicated in malignant transformation and progression. In this study, we evaluated the anti-proliferative effects of a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, entinostat, which was computationally predicted to show anti-cancer activity, as confirmed in in vitro and in vivo models of GEP-NETs.

methodsThis was a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of entinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory abdominal NETs. The primary objective was to estimate the objective response rate to entinostat. Additionally, with each patient as his/her own control we estimated the rates of tumor growth prior to enrollment on study and while receiving entinostat. Patients received 5 mg entinostat weekly until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The dose could be changed to 10 mg biweekly for patients who did not experience grade ≥ 2 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in cycle 1, but was primarily administered at the starting 5 mg weekly dose.

resultsThe study enrolled only 5 patients due to early termination by the drug sponsor. The first patient that enrolled had advanced disease and died within days of enrollment before follow-up imaging due to a grade 5 AE unrelated to study treatment and was considered non-evaluable. Best RECIST response for the remaining 4 patients was stable disease (SD) with time on study of 154+, 243, 574, and 741 days. With each patient as his/her own control, rates of tumor growth on entinostat were markedly reduced with rates 17%, 20%, 33%, and 68% of the rates prior to enrollment on study. Toxicities possibly or definitely related to entinostat included grade 2/3 neutrophil count decrease [2/4 (50%)/ 2/4 (50%)], grade 3 hypophosphatemia [1/4, (25%)], grade 1/2 fatigue [1/4 (25%)/ 2/4 (50%)], and other self-limiting grade 1/2 AEs.

conclusionIn the treatment of relapsed or refractory abdominal NETs, entinostat 5 mg weekly led to prolonged SD and reduced the rate of tumor growth by 32% to 83% with an acceptable safety profile (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03211988).

Indexed as

BenzamidesNeuroendocrine TumorsPyridinesAbdominal NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreatic NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsBenzamidesentinostatHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsPyridinesentinostatGEP-NETHDAC inhibitorsneuroendocrine tumortumor growth rate

Identifiers

PMID38886159
PMCPMC11379646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.