Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886147›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of family medicine2025

Barriers to modern contraceptive use by female workers in Indonesia's urban areas.

Agung Dwi Laksono, Ratna Dwi Wulandari, Ratu Matahari, Yuly Astuti, Eti Rimawati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agung Dwi LaksonoNational Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Ratna Dwi WulandariFaculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Ratu MatahariFaculty of Public Health Science, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Yuly AstutiNational Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Eti RimawatiFaculty of Health, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemale workers in Indonesia are vulnerable, because they must work to earn a living while still being responsible for domestic problems. This study analyzes the barriers to the use of modern contraceptives by female workers in Indonesia's urban areas.

methodsThis cross-sectional survey looked at 21,696 female workers. We used modern contraceptive use as a dependent variable, and age, education, wealth, known modern contraceptives, number of live births, ideal number of children, and insurance ownership as independent variables. In the final test, we employed binary logistic regression.

resultsThe results showed that women at all age categories were more likely than those aged 15-19 years not to use modern contraceptives, except those aged 35-39 years, who showed no difference. All other marital types were more likely to use modern contraceptives than married individuals. Rich female workers were 1.139 times more likely than poor workers not to use modern contraceptives (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.139; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.026-1.264). Female workers who did not know about modern contraceptives were 4.549 times more likely than those who did not to use modern contraceptives (AOR, 4.549; 95% CI, 1.037-19.953). Female workers with more than two children were 9.996 times more likely than those with two or fewer children not to use modern contraceptives (AOR, 9.996; 95% CI, 9.1890-10.875).

conclusionThis study identified five factors associated with the non-use of modern contraceptives by female workers in Indonesia's urban areas: young, unmarried, rich, did not know about modern contraceptives, and had more than two children.

Indexed as

Big DataContraceptive EffectivenessMaternal HealthPublic HealthWomen’s Health Services

Identifiers

PMID38886147
PMCPMC12301674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.