Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886135›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025

Implementing a COVID-19 vaccination outreach service for people experiencing homelessness.

Olivia Hollingdrake, Elizabeth Grech, Leanne Papas, Jane Currie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Implementing a COVID-19 vaccination outreach service for people experiencing homelessness.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olivia HollingdrakeSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1108-4567
Elizabeth GrechSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3051-9981
Leanne PapasSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7980-9819
Jane CurrieSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8721-089X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedIn 2021, the Australian government implemented a population wide COVID-19 vaccination program. People experiencing homelessness faced challenges accessing vaccines and many were not being reached. By reorienting vaccination services to include assertive outreach strategies, a Brisbane-based non-profit health care team successfully administered 2065 COVID-19 vaccinations to homeless and precariously housed people. This study examines insights from stakeholders delivering the service and perspectives of clients who received a vaccine.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with five stakeholders and a survey of 63 clients involved in the Micah Projects COVID-19 vaccination program are reported. Client survey questions covered demographic characteristics, and motivations and hesitancies around vaccination. Stakeholder interviews were inductively analysed and quantitative survey data were exported into SPSS (IBM V27) and analysed using descriptive statistics.

resultsThe Micah Projects team initiated 220 pop-up vaccination clinics and worked closely with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. Downsizing and mobilising the service engaged greater numbers of people sleeping rough and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Clients' decisions to vaccinate were often spontaneous, driven by immediate availability and motivated by a desire to stay healthy and protect the community.

conclusionsTailoring vaccination programs to include assertive outreach strategies effectively reduces barriers for people experiencing homelessness. Community embeddedness, trust, flexibility and cultural safety are critical elements for success. SO WHAT?: People experiencing homelessness are motivated to vaccinate. Reorientating health services to remove structural barriers and build the supportive environments needed to work through vaccine hesitancies are critical elements to ensure equitable access and promote health.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesIll-Housed PersonsAdultAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesCommunity-Institutional RelationsFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansImmunization ProgramsInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPatient Acceptance of Health CareCOVID-19 Vaccinesaccess to careassertive outreachCOVID‐19homelessnessmodel of carevaccinationvaccination hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID38886135
PMCPMC11730347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.