Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38886111›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2024

Challenges and opportunities in neonatal sepsis management: insights from a survey among clinicians in 25 Sub-Saharan African countries.

Flavia Rosa-Mangeret, Marc Dupuis, Juan Emmanuel Dewez, Lulu M Muhe, Noemie Wagner, Riccardo E Pfister

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. BMJ paediatrics open · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Flavia Rosa-MangeretNeonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Mother, Child and Adolescent Department, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland Flavia.RosaMangeret@hcuge.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-6237
Marc DupuisInstitute of Primary Health Care, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Juan Emmanuel DewezPediatrics, Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Geneva, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lulu M MuheAddis Ababa University College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Noemie WagnerPediatrics, Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Geneva, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Riccardo E PfisterNeonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Mother, Child and Adolescent Department, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal sepsis (NS) is a global health issue, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, where it accounts for a substantial portion of neonatal morbimortality. This multicountry survey aimed to elucidate current practices, challenges and case definitions in managing NS among clinicians in Sub-Saharan Africa.

methodsThe survey targeted physicians and medical practitioners working in neonatal care who participated in a Self-Administered Web Questionnaire. The main objective was to understand NS and infection case definitions and management from the clinician's point of view and to identify challenges and opportunities in sepsis management. Participants were queried on demographics, definitions and diagnostic criteria, treatment approaches, and infection prevention and control (IPC) measures. A total of 136 participants from 93 healthcare structures responded, providing valuable insights into NS management practices.

resultsFrom May to July 2022 across 21 Sub-Saharan African countries, 136 neonatal clinicians with an average from 93 structures with on average 10-year experience took the survey. NS ranked highest among prevalent neonatal conditions. Diagnostic case definitions between sepsis and infection were attributed to clinical signs, anamnesis, C reactive protein, white blood cll count and blood cultures with no statistically significant differences. Early-onset sepsis was defined within 72 hours by 48%, while late-onset varied. Antibiotics were likely on admission (86.4%) and during the stay (82.2%). Treatment abandonment was reported unlikely. The preferred antibiotic regimen for early-onset sepsis was intravenous amoxicillin (or ampicillin), gentamycin and cefotaxime. Blood culture availability and IPC protocols were reported as limited, particularly concerning patient environment, pharmacy protocols and clean-dirty circuits.

conclusionsThis NS survey emphasises clinicians' challenges due to limited access to diagnostic tools and raises concerns about antimicrobial overexposure. IPC also seem limited, according to participants. Addressing these challenges can enhance diagnostic practices, antibiotic stewardship and infection control in the region.

Indexed as

Neonatal SepsisAfrica South of the SaharaAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial AgentsInfantLow and Middle Income CountriesNeonatology

Identifiers

PMID38886111
PMCPMC11184178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.