ArticleGenome research2024
Size-based expectation maximization for characterizing nucleosome positions and subtypes.
Article in Genome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural Characterization of Native RNA Polymerase II Transcription Complexes and Nucleosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Nucleosome spacing across cell types, diseases, and ages.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide nucleosome profiles are predominantly characterized using MNase-seq, which involves extensive MNase digestion and size selection to enrich for mononucleosome-sized fragments. Most available MNase-seq analysis packages assume that nucleosomes uniformly protect 147 bp DNA fragments. However, some nucleosomes with atypical histone or chemical compositions protect shorter lengths of DNA. The rigid assumptions imposed by current nucleosome analysis packages potentially prevent investigators from understanding the regulatory roles played by atypical nucleosomes. To enable the characterization of different nucleosome types from MNase-seq data, we introduce the size-based expectation maximization (SEM) nucleosome-calling package. SEM employs a hierarchical Gaussian mixture model to estimate nucleosome positions and subtypes. Nucleosome subtypes are automatically identified based on the distribution of protected DNA fragments. Benchmark analysis indicates that SEM is on par with existing packages in terms of standard nucleosome-calling accuracy metrics, while uniquely providing the ability to characterize nucleosome subtype identities. Applying SEM to a low-dose MNase-H2B-ChIP-seq data set from mouse embryonic stem cells, we identified three nucleosome types: short-fragment nucleosomes, canonical nucleosomes, and di-nucleosomes. Short-fragment nucleosomes can be divided further into two subtypes based on their chromatin accessibility. Short-fragment nucleosomes in accessible regions exhibit high MNase sensitivity and are enriched at transcription start sites (TSSs) and CTCF peaks, similar to previously reported "fragile nucleosomes." These SEM-defined accessible short-fragment nucleosomes are found not just in promoters but also in distal regulatory regions. Additional analyses reveal their colocalization with the chromatin remodelers CHD6, CHD8, and EP400. In summary, SEM provides an effective platform for exploration of nonstandard nucleosome subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.