Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38885892›Full record

ArticleContraception2024

"So that I can trust them with my body:" How people with low incomes who may become pregnant define and prioritize quality reproductive health care.

Anna Newton-Levinson, Sarah C Blake, Andrea Swartzendruber, Michael R Kramer, Jessica M Sales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna Newton-LevinsonDepartment of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: anewto3@emory.edu.
Sarah C BlakeDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andrea SwartzendruberDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The University of Georgia, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Michael R KramerDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jessica M SalesDepartment of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

IRACDA Fellowships in Research and Science Training (FIRST)K12GM000680 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, LOU ANN S, MCCARTY, NAEL A · 2000 to 2024
$41.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM000680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAs part of a larger mixed-methods study to better define equity in access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care in Georgia, this analysis sought to understand: (1) how individuals define quality care for their SRH services; and (2) how quality of care is salient in their SRH care-seeking. STUDY

designFrom January 2019 to February 2020, we conducted life history interviews with individuals with the capacity to become pregnant in suburban areas in Georgia. We analyzed interviews using thematic analysis.

resultsSRH care quality was shaped by experiences with health center environment, with providers, and with staff. Study participants emphasized elements associated with trusted SRH care such as showing compassion, respecting and non-judging, taking time, providing information, and assuring agency. Participants also voiced a desire for holistic care that addressed the lived experiences of the individual. Participants took quality of care into account when care-seeking but sometimes had to weigh out preferences for quality with issues of affordability.

conclusionsAccess to quality person-centered care is an essential component of realized access to SRH services. Measures of equitable access and quality should account for experiences of quality care that include both provider and staff interactions as well as the larger healthcare environment and ability to use quality care despite financial constraints. IMPLICATIONS: Quality family planning care should involve both clinicians and staff to incorporate showing compassion, providing respectful and non-judgmental care, taking time with patients, providing information, assuring agency in decision-making, as well as addressing the lived experiences of individuals.

Indexed as

PovertyQuality of Health CareReproductive Health ServicesAdolescentAdultFemaleGeorgiaHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyTrustYoung AdultContraceptionFamily planningPatient-centeredQuality careReproductive health

Identifiers

PMID38885892
PMCPMC11365768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.