ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024
Excitonic Configuration Interaction: Going Beyond the Frenkel Exciton Model.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient, Hierarchical, and Object-Oriented Electronic Structure Interfaces for Direct Nonadiabatic Dynamics Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Rationalising Exciton Interactions in Aggregates Based on the Transition Density.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Efficient Excitonic Configuration Interaction for Large-Scale Multichromophoric Systems Using the Resolution-of-Identity Approximation.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the excitonic configuration interaction (ECI) method─a fragment-based analogue of the CI method for electronic structure calculations of multichromophoric systems. It can also be viewed as a generalization of the exciton approach, with the following properties: (i) It constructs the effective Hamiltonian exclusively from monomer calculations. (ii) It employs the strong orthogonality assumption and is exact within McWeeny's group function theory, thus requiring only one-electron density matrices of the monomer states. (iii) It is agnostic of the monomer electronic structure method, allowing us to use/combine different methods. (iv) It includes an embedding point charge scheme (called excitonic Hartree-Fock, EHF) to improve the accuracy of the monomer states, but such that the effective full-system Hamiltonian is not explicitly dependent on the embedding. (v) It is systematically improvable, by expanding the set of monomer states and by including configurations where two or more monomers are excited (defining the ECIS, ECISD, etc., methods). The performance of ECI is assessed by computing the absorption spectrum of two exemplary multichromophoric systems, using CIS as the monomer electronic structure method. The accuracy of ECI significantly depends on the chosen embedding charges and the ECI expansion. The most accurate assessed combinations─ECIS or ECISD with EHF embedding─yield spectra that agree qualitatively and quantitatively with full-system direct calculations, with deviations of the excitation energies below 0.1 eV. We also show that ECISD based on CIS monomer calculations can predict states where two monomers are excited simultaneously (e.g., triplet-triplet double-local excitations) that are inaccessible in a full-system CIS calculation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.