Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38885484›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2024

Comparison of treatment response measures in cutaneous sclerosis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Joseph A Pidala, Lynn Onstad, Emily Baumrin, Paul A Carpenter, Corey Cutler, Sally Arai, Carrie L Kitko, George L Chen, Stephanie J Lee

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joseph A PidalaBlood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Immunotherapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
Lynn OnstadClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Emily BaumrinDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-0396-2005
Paul A CarpenterClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-5021-0714
Corey CutlerDivision of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Sally AraiDivision of BMT and Cellular Therapy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-1993-4172
Carrie L KitkoPediatric Stem Cell Transplant Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
George L ChenDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.
Stephanie J LeeFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0003-2600-6390

Funding

Improving Outcomes Assessment in Chronic GVHDR01CA118953 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LEE, STEPHANIE J · 2011 to 2025
$8.3M
Training and Career Development CoreU54CA163438 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LEE, STEPHANIE J · 2011 to 2014
$3.7M
Improving Outcomes Assessment in Chronic GVHDU01CA118953 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LEE, STEPHANIE J · 2007 to 2010
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118953NCI NIH HHS U01 CA118953NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractCutaneous sclerosis, a highly morbid subtype of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), demonstrates limited treatment response under current National Institutes of Health (NIH) response measures. We explored novel sclerosis-specific response measures using Chronic GVHD Consortium data. A training cohort included patients with cutaneous sclerosis from a randomized trial of imatinib vs rituximab and a consortium observational study. The validation cohort was a different consortium observational study. Clinician-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were examined for association with 6-month clinician-reported response. Patient-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were studied for association with 6-month patient-reported response. A total of 347 patients were included (training 183 and validation 164). Although multiple skin and joint measures were associated with clinician-reported response on univariate analysis, patient range of motion (PROM) total score, PROM total score change, and NIH 0 to 3 skin change were retained in the final multivariate model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.83 training and 0.75 validation). Similarly, many patient-reported measures were associated, but final multivariate analysis retained the human activity profile adjusted activity score (AAS), 36 item short form health survey (SF36) vitality change, Lee symptom scale (LSS) skin, and LSS skin change in the model (AUC, 0.86 training and 0.75 validation). We identified which sclerosis measures have the greatest association with 6-month clinician- and patient-reported treatment responses, a previously unstudied area. However, given the observed performance in the validation cohorts, we conclude that further work is needed. Novel response measures may be needed to optimally assess treatment response in cutaneous sclerosis.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSclerosisTransplantation, HomologousTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38885484
PMCPMC11402177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.