Observational studyRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
Assessment of damage in Takayasu's arteritis.
Observational study in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of Takayasu Arteritis - A 2026 Update.Current rheumatology reports · 2026Review
- Impairment of Diverse Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Takayasu Arteritis: A Cohort Study.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2026Article
- Construction and internal cohort verification of clinical-imaging-based nomogram for early diagnosis in Takayasu arteritis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Childhood-onset Takayasu arteritis: clinical presentation, challenges and disease course.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate damage and clinical characteristics associated with damage in Takayasu's arteritis (TAK).
methodsPatients with TAK enrolled in a multicentre, prospective, observational study underwent standardized damage assessment every 6 months using the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) and the Large-Vessel Vasculitis Index of Damage (LVVID).
resultsThe study included 236 patients with TAK: 92% female, 81% Caucasian; median (25th, 75th percentile) disease duration = 2.6 (0.12, 6.9) years. Eighty-four percent had follow-up: median (25th, 75th) duration 4.1 (1.9, 7.5) years. Items of damage were present in 89% on VDI, 87% on LVVID, in the peripheral vascular (76% VDI, 74% LVVID) and cardiac (40% VDI, 45% LVVID) systems. During follow-up, 42% patients had new damage, including major vessel stenosis/arterial occlusion (8%), limb claudication (6%), hypertension (7%), aortic aneurysm (4%) and bypass surgery (4%). Disease-specific damage accounted for >90% of new items. Older age, relapse and longer duration of follow-up were associated with new damage items; a higher proportion of patients without new damage were on MTX (P <0.05). Among 48 patients diagnosed with TAK within 180 days of enrolment, new damage occurred in 31% on VDI and 52% on LVVID. History of relapse was associated with new damage in the entire cohort while in patients with a recent diagnosis, older age at diagnosis was associated with new damage.
conclusionDamage is present in >80% of patients with TAK even with recent diagnosis and >40% of patients accrue new, mainly disease-specific damage. Therapies for TAK that better control disease activity and prevent damage should be prioritized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.