Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38885288›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Women's participation in household decision-making: Qualitative findings from the Shonjibon Trial in rural Bangladesh.

Elizabeth K Kirkwood, Jasmin Khan, Mohammad Mehedi Hasan, Afrin Iqbal, Tazeen Tahsina, Tanvir Huda, John Frederick Hoddinott, Tracey Lea Laba, Sumithra Muthayya, Nicholas Goodwin and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gender Differences in Household Indoor Air Pollution Practices and Health Communication Preferences in Dubai.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Elizabeth K KirkwoodFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8603-4903
Jasmin KhanMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Mehedi HasanMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0630-290X
Afrin IqbalMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1859-8405
Tazeen TahsinaMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tanvir HudaFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
John Frederick HoddinottDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0590-3917
Tracey Lea LabaCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sumithra MuthayyaFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicholas GoodwinFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2476-6310
Munirul IslamNutrition and Clinical Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Emwinyore Agho KingsleySchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Shams E ArifeenMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Michael J DibleyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1554-5180
Neeloy Ashraful AlamFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7034-1095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key element of women's empowerment is the ability to participate in household decision-making. This study presents the qualitative results from the Shonjibon Cash and Counselling Trial baseline process evaluation with the aim of exploring the status of women's decision-making at the trial's outset and to facilitate the exploration of any changes in women's empowerment over the course of the trial. Between January and March 2021, we conducted forty-one in-depth interviews with pregnant women in rural Bangladesh. The research team translated, transcribed, coded, and discussed the interviews. We used thematic analysis to examine women's experience and perceptions on household decision-making. The key findings that emerged; women jointly participated in financial decision-making with their husbands; men made the final decision regarding seeking healthcare, and women solely made choices regarding infant and young child feeding. Our findings revealed that women felt that they needed to discuss their plans to go outside the house with their husbands, many perceived a lack of importance in the community towards women's participation in decision-making. This study documents current contextual information on the status of women's involvement in household decision-making and intrahousehold power dynamics at the start of the Shonjibon Cash and Counselling Trial.

Identifiers

PMID38885288
PMCPMC11182512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.