ArticlePloS one2024
Comparison of DeNovix, NanoDrop and Qubit for DNA quantification and impurity detection of bacterial DNA extracts.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- FKBP5 methylation, temperament, and chronotype in adolescent posttraumatic stress disorder: a preliminary case-control study.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- Practical Pipetting Optimization Strategies for Accurate Concentration Measurement of High-Concentration Protein Formulations.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of wastewater sample processing methods for antimicrobial resistance surveillance.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Evaluating Variability in Extracellular Vesicle Characterization Across Measurement Techniques.Journal of extracellular biology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of DNA extraction methods from clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis primary liquid culture for whole-genome sequencing.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Impact of DNA Extraction Strategies on Genomic and Bioinformatic Outcomes in Eight Selected Fungal Strains.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Simplified and Efficient Protocol for DNA Isolation from Deer Antlers and Prepared Trophy Skulls.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Molecular identification and biological activity of a red sea bacterial isolate.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Multiplex TaqMan Real-Time PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of PEDV Genotypes G1, S-INDEL, and G2.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Article
- Temperature regulation mechanisms of diapause inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Neonatal jaundice and the infant gut microbiome: an integrated shotgun metagenomics and bidirectional Mendelian randomization study in Xinjiang.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological and molecular perspectives on thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumors and SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung carcinomas.Pathologica · 2025Review
- Differences in Microbial Community Structure Determine the Functional Specialization of Gut Segments ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Combination of Sample Preservation Approaches and DNA Extraction Methods for Long-Read Sequencing of Nudibranchs' Genomes.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Comparative pilot study of three commercial kits for bacterial DNA extraction from human subgingival biofilm samples collected with a single paper point.Journal of oral microbiology · 2025Article
- DNA extraction from long-term preserved formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of thymic epithelial tumours - a performance comparison of three commercial kits.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2025Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence of theMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025Article
- Sequencing the ocular surface microbiome: a review of methodological practices and considerations.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate DNA quantification is key for downstream application including library preparations for whole genome sequencing (WGS) and the quantification of standards for quantitative PCR. Two commonly used technologies for nucleic acid quantification are based on spectrometry, such as NanoDrop, and fluorometry, such as Qubit. The DS-11+ Series spectrophotometer/fluorometer (DeNovix) is a UV spectrophotometry-based instrument and is a relatively new spectrophotometric method but has not yet been compared to established platforms. Here, we compared three DNA quantification platforms, including two UV spectrophotometry-based techniques (DeNovix and NanoDrop) and one fluorometry-based approach (Qubit). We used genomic prokaryotic DNA extracted from Streptococcus pneumoniae using a Roche DNA extraction kit. We also evaluated purity assessment and effect of a single freeze-thaw cycle. Spectrophotometry-based methods reported 3 to 4-fold higher mean DNA concentrations compared to Qubit, both before and after freezing. The ratio of DNA concentrations assessed by spectrophotometry on the one hand, and Qubit on the other hand, was function of the A260/280. In case DNA was pure (A260/280 between 1.7 and 2.0), the ratio DeNovix or Nanodrop vs. Qubit was close or equal to 2, while this ratio showed an incline for DNA with increasing A260/280 values > 2.0. The A260/280 and A260/230 purity ratios exhibited negligible variation across spectrophotometric methods and freezing conditions. The comparison of DNA concentrations from before and after freezing revealed no statistically significant disparities for each technique. DeNovix exhibited the highest Spearman correlation coefficient (0.999), followed by NanoDrop (0.81), and Qubit (0.77). In summary, there is no difference between DeNovix and NanoDrop in estimated gDNA concentrations of S. pneumoniae, and the spectrophotometry methods estimated close or equal to 2 times higher concentrations compared to Qubit for pure DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.