Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38885210›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Evaluation of factors predicting tinnitus outcomes following cochlear implantation: Protocol for a prospective quasi-experimental study.

Bas Labree, Magdalena Sereda, Helen Cullington, Susan Johnson, Paige Church, Josephine Dunster, Derek J Hoare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bas LabreeNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3999-4562
Magdalena SeredaNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Helen CullingtonAuditory Implant Service, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5093-2020
Susan JohnsonNottingham Auditory Implant Programme, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Paige ChurchNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Josephine DunsterIndependent Researcher, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Derek J HoareNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8768-1392

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implantation is an effective intervention to restore useful aspects of hearing function in adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Tinnitus, the perception of sound in the absence of an external source, is common in people with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Existing evidence suggests cochlear implantation may be effective in reducing the negative impact of tinnitus in this population. However, this is contradicted by data suggesting that up to half of cochlear implant recipients experience tinnitus, and that some of these patients who did not have tinnitus before cochlear implantation experience it after surgery or cochlear implant activation. Most evidence on the effects of cochlear implantation on tinnitus comes from secondary data in cochlear implant studies primarily concerned with hearing-related outcomes. Hence, the quality of the evidence for effects on tinnitus is low and not suitable to inform clinical recommendations or decision-making. This study will systematically collect data on tinnitus and tinnitus-related outcomes from patients at multiple points during the cochlear implant pathway to characterise changes in tinnitus. This will improve our understanding of the effects of cochlear implantation for tinnitus in adults with severe to profound hearing loss and inform the design of clinical trials of cochlear implantation for tinnitus.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationTinnitusAdultCochlear ImplantsFemaleHearing LossHumansMaleProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38885210
PMCPMC11182524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.