Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38885014›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Differences in Physicians' Ratings of Work Stressors and Resources Associated With Digital Transformation: Cross-Sectional Study.

Magdalena Katharina Wekenborg, Katharina Förster, Florian Schweden, Robin Weidemann, Felix von Bechtolsheim, Clemens Kirschbaum, Jürgen Weitz, Beate Ditzen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Magdalena Katharina WekenborgChair of Biopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4498-107X
Katharina FörsterClinical Psychology and Behavioural Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3041-9246
Florian SchwedenInstitute for Work Design and Organizational Development INAGO, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8202-1811
Robin WeidemannClinic of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus St. Joseph-Stift, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4632-1101
Felix von BechtolsheimDepartment of Gastrointestinal, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2180-7981
Clemens KirschbaumChair of Biopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3707-4444
Jürgen WeitzDepartment of Gastrointestinal, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5760-6391
Beate DitzenInstitute of Medical Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5853-4572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic rapidly accelerated the need and implementation of digital innovations, especially in medicine.

objectiveTo gain a better understanding of the stress associated with digital transformation in physicians, this study aims to identify working conditions that are stress relevant for physicians and differ in dependence on digital transformation. In addition, we examined the potential role of individual characteristics (ie, age, gender, and actual implementation of a digital innovation within the last 3 years) in digitalization-associated differences in these working conditions.

methodsCross-sectional web-based questionnaire data of 268 physicians (mean age 40.9, SD 12.3 y; n=150, 56% women) in Germany were analyzed. Physicians rated their chronic stress level and 11 relevant working conditions (ie, work stressors such as time pressure and work resources such as influence on sequence) both before and after either a fictional or real implementation of a relevant digital transformation at their workplace. In addition, a subsample of individuals (60; n=33, 55% women) submitted self-collected hair samples for cortisol analysis.

resultsThe stress relevance of the selected working conditions was confirmed by significant correlations with self-rated chronic stress and hair cortisol levels (hair F) within the sample, all of them in the expected direction (P values between .01 and <.001). Multilevel modeling revealed significant differences associated with digital transformation in the rating of 8 (73%) out of 11 working conditions. More precisely, digital transformation was associated with potentially stress-enhancing effects in 6 working conditions (ie, influence on procedures and complexity of tasks) and stress-reducing effects in 2 other working conditions (ie, perceived workload and time pressure). Younger individuals, women, and individuals whose workplaces have implemented digital innovations tended to perceive digitalization-related differences in working conditions as rather stress-reducing.

conclusionsOur study lays the foundation for future hypothesis-based longitudinal research by identifying those working conditions that are stress relevant for physicians and prone to differ as a function of digital transformation and individual characteristics.

Indexed as

COVID-19Occupational StressPhysiciansAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHairHumansHydrocortisoneMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesHydrocortisonechronic stressdigital transformationhair cortisol concentrationphysicianswork resourceswork stressors

Identifiers

PMID38885014
PMCPMC11217711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.