Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38885012›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2024

Web-Based Forums for People Experiencing Substance Use or Gambling Disorders: Scoping Review.

Annette Peart, Freya Horn, Rachel Petukhova, Anthony Barnett, Dan I Lubman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annette PeartEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0536-276X
Freya HornEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2308-0854
Rachel PetukhovaEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-2579-615X
Anthony BarnettEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2804-4585
Dan I LubmanEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6747-1937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor people experiencing substance use or gambling disorders, web-based peer-supported forums are a space where they can share their experiences, gather around a collective goal, and find mutual support. Web-based peer support can help to overcome barriers to attending face-to-face meetings by enabling people experiencing addiction to seek support beyond their physical location and with the benefit of anonymity if desired. Understanding who participates in web-based peer-supported forums (and how), and the principles underpinning forums, can also assist those interested in designing or implementing similar platforms.

objectiveThis study aims to review the literature on how people experiencing substance use or gambling disorders, and their family, friends, and supporters, use and participate in web-based peer-supported forums. Specifically, we asked the following research questions: (1) What are the characteristics of people who use web-based peer-supported substance use or gambling-focused forums? (2) How do people participate in web-based peer-supported forums? (3) What are the key principles reportedly underpinning the web-based peer-supported forums? (4) What are the reported outcomes of web-based peer-supported forums?

methodsInclusion criteria for our scoping review were peer-reviewed primary studies reporting on web-based addiction forums for adults and available in English. A primary search of 10 databases occurred in June 2021, with 2 subsequent citation searches of included studies in September 2022 and February 2024.

resultsOf the 14 included studies, the majority of web-based peer-supported forums reported were aimed specifically for, or largely used by, people experiencing alcohol problems. Results from the 9 studies that did report demographic data suggest forum users were typically women, aged between 40 years and early 50 years. Participation in web-based peer-supported forums was reported quantitatively and qualitatively. The forums reportedly were underpinned by a range of key principles, mostly mutual help approaches and recovery identity formation. Only 3 included studies reported on outcomes for forum users.

conclusionsWeb-based peer-supported forums are used by people experiencing addiction in a number of ways, to share information and experiences, and give and receive support. Seeking web-based support offers an alternative approach to traditional face-to-face support options, and may reduce some barriers to engaging in peer support.

Indexed as

GamblingInternetPeer GroupSubstance-Related DisordersHumansSocial Supportaddictionaddictionsaddictiveforumforumsgamblingpeer-basedpeer supportreview methodreview methodologyscopingsubstance abusesubstance useweb-based forums

Identifiers

PMID38885012
PMCPMC11217707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.