ArticleEndocrine2024
Multimodal integration of radiology and pathology signatures for distinguishing between aldosterone-producing adenomas and nonfunctional adrenal adenomas.
Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The application of artificial intelligence in adrenal imaging: current state of knowledge, challenges, and future directions.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a nomogram combining radiomics and pathology features to distinguish between aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs) and nonfunctional adrenal adenomas (NF-AAs).
methodsConsecutive patients diagnosed with adrenal adenomas via computed tomography (CT) or pathologic analysis between January 2011 and November 2022 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. CT images and hematoxylin & eosin-stained slides were used for annotation and feature extraction. The selected radiomics and pathology features were used to develop a risk model using various machine learning models, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was determined to evaluate diagnostic performance. The predicted results from radiomics and pathology features were combined and visualized using a nomogram.
resultsA total of 211 patients (APAs, n = 59; NF-AAs, n = 152) were included in this study, with patients randomly divided into either the training set or the testing set at a ratio of 8:2. The ExtraTrees model yielded a sensitivity of 0.818, a specificity of 0.733, and an accuracy of 0.756 (AUC = 0.817; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.675-0.958) in the radiomics testing set and a sensitivity of 0.999, a specificity of 0.842, and an accuracy of 0.867 (AUC = 0.905, 95% CI: 0.792-1.000) in the pathology testing set. A nomogram combining radiomics and pathology features demonstrated a strong performance (AUC = 0.912; 95% CI: 0.807-1.000).
conclusionA nomogram combining radiomics and pathology features demonstrated strong predictive accuracy and discrimination capability. This model may help clinicians to distinguish between APAs and NF-AAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38884928What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.