ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires in mechanical thrombectomy using inverse reinforcement learning.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor: Autonomous robotic thrombectomy should be considered a near-term frontier for AI-enabled interventional radiology.European radiology · 2026Article
- Robot-Assisted Mechanical Thrombectomy for Neurointerventional Surgery: An Exploratory Scoping Review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Vascular geometry characterization for AI-based endovascular navigation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Toward real-time autonomous navigation: transformer-based catheter tip tracking in fluoroscopy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Advancements and challenges in autonomous endovascular interventional robotics: A comprehensive review.iScience · 2025Review
- Reinforcement learning for safe autonomous two-device navigation of cerebral vessels in mechanical thrombectomy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Benchmarking reinforcement learning algorithms for autonomous mechanical thrombectomy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Advanced Robotics for the Next-Generation of Cardiac Interventions.Micromachines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAutonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires can enhance endovascular surgery safety and efficacy, reducing procedure times and operator radiation exposure. Integrating tele-operated robotics could widen access to time-sensitive emergency procedures like mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Reinforcement learning (RL) shows potential in endovascular navigation, yet its application encounters challenges without a reward signal. This study explores the viability of autonomous guidewire navigation in MT vasculature using inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) to leverage expert demonstrations.
methodsEmploying the Simulation Open Framework Architecture (SOFA), this study established a simulation-based training and evaluation environment for MT navigation. We used IRL to infer reward functions from expert behaviour when navigating a guidewire and catheter. We utilized the soft actor-critic algorithm to train models with various reward functions and compared their performance in silico.
resultsWe demonstrated feasibility of navigation using IRL. When evaluating single- versus dual-device (i.e. guidewire versus catheter and guidewire) tracking, both methods achieved high success rates of 95% and 96%, respectively. Dual tracking, however, utilized both devices mimicking an expert. A success rate of 100% and procedure time of 22.6 s were obtained when training with a reward function obtained through 'reward shaping'. This outperformed a dense reward function (96%, 24.9 s) and an IRL-derived reward function (48%, 59.2 s).
conclusionsWe have contributed to the advancement of autonomous endovascular intervention navigation, particularly MT, by effectively employing IRL based on demonstrator expertise. The results underscore the potential of using reward shaping to efficiently train models, offering a promising avenue for enhancing the accessibility and precision of MT procedures. We envisage that future research can extend our methodology to diverse anatomical structures to enhance generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.