Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38884861›Full record

ReviewCell biochemistry and biophysics2024

Detailed role of SR-A1 and SR-E3 in tumor biology, progression, and therapy.

Mohamed J Saadh, Harikumar Pallathadka, Hussein Salim Abed, Soumya V Menon, G V Sivaprasad, Ahmed Hjazi, Jasur Rizaev, Sahil Suri, Mohammed Abed Jawad, Beneen Husseen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cell biochemistry and biophysics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamed J SaadhFaculty of Pharmacy, Middle East University, Amman, 11831, Jordan.
Harikumar PallathadkaManipur International University, Imphal, Manipur, India. Pallathadkaharikumar1402@gmail.com.
Hussein Salim AbedDepartment of Medical Laboratory Techniques, Al-Maarif University College, Al-Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq. Hussein.salem@uoa.edu.iq.
Soumya V MenonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
G V SivaprasadDepartment of Basic Science & Humanities, Raghu Engineering College, Visakhapatnam, India.
Ahmed HjaziDepartment of Medical Laboratory, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Jasur RizaevDepartment of Public health and Healthcare management, Rector, Samarkand State Medical University, 18, Amir Temur Street, Samarkand, Uzbekistan.
Sahil SuriCentre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura, 140417, Punjab, India.
Mohammed Abed JawadDepartment of Pharmaceutics/ Al-Nisour University College, Baghdad, Iraq.
Beneen HusseenMedical Laboratory Technique College, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first host defense systems are the innate immune response and the inflammatory response. Among innate immune cells, macrophages, are crucial because they preserve tissue homeostasis and eradicate infections by phagocytosis, or the ingestion of particles. Macrophages exhibit phenotypic variability contingent on their stimulation state and tissue environment and may be detected in several tissues. Meanwhile, critical inflammatory functions are played by macrophage scavenger receptors, in particular, SR-A1 (CD204) and SR-E3 (CD206), in a variety of pathophysiologic events. Such receptors, which are mainly found on the surface of multiple types of macrophages, have different effects on processes, including atherosclerosis, innate and adaptive immunity, liver and lung diseases, and, more recently, cancer. Although macrophage scavenger receptors have been demonstrated to be active across the disease spectrum, conflicting experimental findings and insufficient signaling pathways have hindered our comprehension of the molecular processes underlying its array of roles. Herein, as SR-A1 and SR-E3 functions are often binary, either protecting the host or impairing the pathophysiology of cancers has been reviewed. We will look into their function in malignancies, with an emphasis on their recently discovered function in macrophages and the possible therapeutic benefits of SR-A1 and SR-E3 targeting.

Indexed as

MacrophagesNeoplasmsScavenger Receptors, Class AAnimalsDisease ProgressionHumansMannose-Binding LectinsMannose ReceptorMembrane GlycoproteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, ImmunologicMannose-Binding LectinsMannose ReceptorMembrane GlycoproteinsMRC1 protein, humanMSR1 protein, humanReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, ImmunologicScavenger Receptors, Class ACancerMacrophagesSR-A1SR-E3Therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.