ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2024
Revisiting intrathecal thiotepa: Efficacy and safety in secondary CNS malignancies.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design, synthesis and antitumor activity of thiadiazole derivatives as novel ALK kinase inhibitors.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Case Report: Extended survival in KRAS-G12V NSCLC with leptomeningeal metastasis through integrated intrathecal chemotherapy and systemic therapies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Which drug would be more effective in treating patients with leptomeningeal metastases from breast cancer: intrathecal thiotepa or methotrexate?Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treating metastatic malignancies to the central nervous system (CNS) is challenging because many drugs cannot cross the blood-brain-barrier (BBB). Direct intrathecal (IT) drug administration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a strategy to overcome this problem. Thiotepa has effective CNS penetration but its popularity has waned over the last two decades due to concerns about its efficacy and potential systemic toxicity. This review evaluates the available evidence for the use of IT thiotepa in hematologic malignancies and non-CNS solid tumors with leptomeningeal disease metastases (LMD). Our search shows that IT thiotepa is a reasonable alternative in hematologic malignancies and LMD due to solid organ malignancies. This suggests a potential role of IT thiotepa in second-or third-line treatment or a substitute role in cases of drug-shortages and adverse effects with other agents. Future research should focus on rigorous comparative trials to establish its definitive role in the evolving landscape of CNS-directed chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38884819What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.