ArticleClinical oral investigations2024
Oral microbial dysbiosis in patients with oral cavity cancers.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The oral bacterial microbiota change in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Microbiota and head and neck cancers: Mechanistic insights and translational potential.Virulence · 2026Review
- Aging and periodontitis increase brain dissemination of oral bacteria.Journal of periodontology · 2026Article
- Role of Oral-Lung Infection Axis on Respiratory Health.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Novel salivary biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease identified by integrated metabolomics and microbiomics analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Exploring lived experiences in oral cavity cancer: an Asia-Pacific perspective on psychosocial challenges and opportunities for enhanced patient-centric care.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- The role ofFrontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Lesion-specific oral microbiome signatures and predicted carcinogenic pathways in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a paired-site study in Pakistan.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Article
- Special Issue "Pathogenesis and Treatments of Head and Neck Cancer".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Understanding the potential of probiotics in oral cancer prevention: a short review on microbial modulation.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Metabolic and microbial alterations in oral potentially malignant disorders versus oral squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genetic and Epigenetic Biomarkers for the Early Oral Cancerization Risk in Periodontitis Patients.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Comparison of Long-Term Oral Bacterial Flora Before and After Orthognathic Surgery in Surgical Orthodontic Treatment.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- An Update Regarding the Use of Contemporary Dental Materials in Periodontal Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Oral Microbiome as a Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Head and Neck Cancer: Current Insights and Future Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
- Recent advancements in artificial intelligence-powered cancer prediction from oral microbiome.Periodontology 2000 · 2025Review
- Analysis of the current situation and risk factors of nosocomial infections in oral cancer patients after surgery.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- The link between inflammatory/ SCFA profiles and oral/gut microbiome: an observational study in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Current research in microbial sciences · 2025Article
- OralFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe pathogenesis of oral cavity cancers is complex. We tested the hypothesis that oral microbiota dysbiosis is associated with oral cavity cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with primary oral cavity cancer who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. Matching healthy individuals were recruited as controls. Data on socio-demographic and behavioral factors, self-reported periodontal measures and habits, and current dental status were collected using a structured questionnaire and periodontal chartings. In addition to self-reported oral health measures, each participant received a standard and detailed clinical examination. DNA was extracted from saliva samples from patients and healthy controls. Next-generation sequencing was performed by targeting V3-V4 gene regions of the 16 S rRNA with subsequent bioinformatic analyses.
resultsPatients with oral cavity cancers had a lower quality of oral health than healthy controls. Proteobacteria, Aggregatibacter, Haemophilus, and Neisseria decreased, while Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Lactobacillus, Gemella, and Fusobacteria increased in oral cancer patients. At the species level, C. durum, L. umeaens, N. subflava, A. massiliensis, and V. dispar were significantly lower, while G. haemolysans was significantly increased (p < 0.05). Major periodontopathogens associated with periodontal disease (P. gingivalis and F.nucleatum) increased 6.5- and 2.8-fold, respectively.
conclusionThese data suggested that patients with oral cancer had worse oral health conditions and a distinct oral microbiome composition that is affected by personal daily habits and may be associated with the pathogenicity of the disease and interspecies interactions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This paper demonstrates the link between oral bacteria and oral cancers, identifying mechanistic interactions between species of oral microbiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.