SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024
A systematic review on the efficacy of adjunctive surgical strategies during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia without intraoperative evidence of neurovascular conflict.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychological assessment in patients affected by trigeminal neuralgia. A systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Partial sensory rhizotomy in therapy-refractory and recurrent trigeminal neuralgia - a single center experience.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Nerve Combing for Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia Without Neurovascular Compression.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim of the present study was to conduct a comprehensive review of surgical strategies that can be offered to patients with trigeminal neuralgia undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery and without intraoperative evidence of neurovascular conflict, with a high pre-operative suspicion of conflict lacking intraoperative confirmation, or individuals experiencing recurrence after previous treatment. This systematic review followed established guidelines (PRISMA) to identify and critically appraise relevant studies. The review question was formulated according to the PICO (P: patients; I: intervention; C: comparison; O: outcomes) framework as follows. For patients with trigeminal neuralgia (P) undergoing MVD surgery (I) without demonstrable preoperative neurovascular conflict, high suspicion of conflict but no intraoperative confirmation or recurrence after previous treatment (C), do additional surgical techniques (nerve combing, neurapraxia, arachnoid lysis) (O) improve pain relief outcomes (O)? The search of the literature yielded a total of 221 results. Duplicate records were then removed (n = [76]). A total of 143 papers was screened, and 117 records were excluded via title and abstract screening; 26 studies were found to be relevant to our research question and were assessed for eligibility. Upon full-text review, 17 articles were included in the review, describing the following techniques; (1) internal neurolysis (n = 6) (2) arachnoid lysis/adhesiolysis (n = 2) (3) neurapraxia (n = 3) (4) partial rhizotomy of the sensory root (n = 4) (5) pontine descending tractotomy (n = 2). The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions) assessment tool. While the described techniques hold promise, further research is warranted to establish standardized protocols, refine surgical approaches, and comprehensively evaluate long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38884812What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.