Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38884724›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2024

Technologies to Study Genetics and Molecular Pathways.

Marcel Grunert, Cornelia Dorn, Ana Dopazo, Fátima Sánchez-Cabo, Jésus Vázquez, Silke Rickert-Sperling, Enrique Lara-Pezzi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcel GrunertCardiovascular Genetics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Cornelia DornCardiovascular Genetics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ana DopazoGenomics Unit, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain.
Fátima Sánchez-CaboBioinformatics Unit, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain.
Jésus VázquezProteomics Unit, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain.
Silke Rickert-SperlingCardiovascular Genetics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. silke.sperling@charite.de.
Enrique Lara-PezziMyocardial Homeostasis and Cardiac Injury Programme, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain. elara@cnic.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last few decades, the study of congenital heart disease (CHD) has benefited from various model systems and the development of molecular biological techniques enabling the analysis of single gene as well as global effects. In this chapter, we first describe different models including CHD patients and their families, animal models ranging from invertebrates to mammals, and various cell culture systems. Moreover, techniques to experimentally manipulate these models are discussed. Second, we introduce cardiac phenotyping technologies comprising the analysis of mouse and cell culture models, live imaging of cardiogenesis, and histological methods for fixed hearts. Finally, the most important and latest molecular biotechniques are described. These include genotyping technologies, different applications of next-generation sequencing, and the analysis of transcriptome, epigenome, proteome, and metabolome. In summary, the models and technologies presented in this chapter are essential to study the function and development of the heart and to understand the molecular pathways underlying CHD.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesDisease Models, AnimalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicePhenotypeAnimal modelsArray-CGHArray comparative genomic hybridizationATAC-seqCaenorhabditis elegansCardiomyocytesCell cultureChickenChIPChIP-seqChromatin immunoprecipitationClawed frogCLIPCRISPRDNA methylationDrosophila melanogasterEmbryonic stem cellsEpigenomeES cellsFACSFISHFluorescence-activated cell sortingFluorescence in situ hybridizationFruit flyGallus gallusGenome-wide association studiesGenotyping technologiesGWASHistological analysisImagingImmunohistochemistryInduced pluripotent ES cellsIn situ hybridizationiPSCsMagnetic resonance imagingMass spectrometryMBDMetabolomeMicro-computed tomographyMicro-CTMorpholino oligonucleotidesMouseMRIMSMus musculusNematodeNext-generation sequencingNGSNKX2-5NMRNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyPAR-CLIPPhenotypingProteomeRatRattus norvegicusRNA-seqSanger sequencingSILACSingle-nucleotide polymorphismsSNPsTALENsTranscription activator-like effector nucleasesTranscriptomeXenopus laevisYeast-two-hybridZebrafishZFNZinc finger nucleases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.