Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38884642›Full record

ReviewUrolithiasis2024

Being all-seeing gymnast within kidney cavity: analysis of the optical and flexibility characteristics trends of 61 flexible ureteroscopes over four decades.

Ali Talyshinskii, B M Zeeshan Hameed, Nithesh Naik, Kinju Adhikari, Ulanbek Zhanbyrbekuly, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Bhaskar Kumar Somani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urolithiasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ali TalyshinskiiDepartment of Urology, Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3521-8937
B M Zeeshan HameedDepartment of Urology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2904-351X
Nithesh NaikDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0356-7697
Kinju AdhikariDepartment of Urology, HCG Cancer Centre of Bangalore, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7173-121X
Ulanbek ZhanbyrbekulyDepartment of Urology, Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1849-6924
Patrick Juliebø-JonesDepartment of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4253-1283
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK. bhaskarsomani@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to analyze the trend in optical features and flexibility changes of flexible ureteroscopes over the past decades, and determine the correlation of individual parameters with release period as well as with dimensional parameters. Flexible ureteroscopes mentioned in the literature or those commercially available were searched. To minimize the search bias, the instruments were grouped by release date time-periods of < 2000 year, 2000-2009, 2010-2019, and 2020 onwards. The final review included only those instrument models for which data on minimum and maximum depth of field, field of view, direction of view, and deflection degree had been determined. The correlation among features investigated as well as with release period was also determined. 61 models of flexible ureteroscopes (27 fibreoptic and 34 digital scopes) were included. Among the different features investigated among fiberoptic endoscopes, minimum depth of field positively and negatively correlated with channel size and field of view, respectively, whereas maximum depth of view and field of view positively correlated with overall shaft and deflection degree, respectively. Up and down deflection strongly correlated with each other and both were negatively proportional to the distal tip size. For the digital endoscopes, minimum depth of field negatively and positively correlated with distal tip size and working length, respectively. Maximum depth of field positively correlated with field of view, whereas the latter was negatively proportional to the overall shaft. As for the fiberoptic counterparts, up and down deflection strongly correlated with each other. Field of view, up and down deflection of fiberoptic flexible ureteroscopes, were significantly increased among fiberoptic and digital endoscopes over decades. As flexible ureteroscopy technology has evolved, there has been a trend towards increasing field of view with up and down deflection. Given the importance of scope ergonomics, one aspect of this popularity is the improvement of optical characteristics and deflection degree, which significantly correlates with the release period.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignUreteroscopesFiber Optic TechnologyHumansKidneyUreteroscopyDeflectionDepth of fieldField of viewFlexible ureteroscopyRIRS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.