ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Visual Field Prognosis From Macula and Circumpapillary Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the structural-functional loss relationship from optic-nerve-head- and macula-centred spectral-domain (SD) Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) images in the full spectrum of glaucoma patients using deep-learning methods. Methods: A cohort comprising 5238 unique eyes classified as suspects or diagnosed with glaucoma was considered. All patients underwent ophthalmologic examination consisting of standard automated perimetry (SAP), macular OCT, and peri-papillary OCT on the same day. Deep learning models were trained to estimate G-pattern visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) and cluster MD using retinal thickness maps from seven layers: retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer (GCL + IPL), inner nuclear layer and outer plexiform layer (INL + OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL), photoreceptors and retinal pigmented epithelium (PR + RPE), choriocapillaris and choroidal stroma (CC + CS), total retinal thickness (RT). Results: The best performance on MD prediction is achieved by RNFL, GCL + IPL and RT layers, with R2 scores of 0.37, 0.33, and 0.31, respectively. Combining macular and peri-papillary scans outperforms single modality prediction, achieving an R2 value of 0.48. Cluster MD predictions show promising results, notably in central clusters, reaching an R2 of 0.56. Conclusions: The combination of multiple modalities, such as optic-nerve-head circular B-scans and retinal thickness maps from macular SD-OCT images, improves the performance of MD and cluster MD prediction. Our proposed model demonstrates the highest level of accuracy in predicting MD in the early-to-mid stages of glaucoma. Translational Relevance: Objective measures recorded with SD-OCT can optimize the number of visual field tests and improve individualized glaucoma care by adjusting VF testing frequency based on deep-learning estimates of functional damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.