Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38884418›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatal medicine2024

"It feels like you have to choose one or the other": a qualitative analysis of obstetrician focus groups on periviability counseling.

Katherine M Johnson, Kathryn Delaney, Melissa A Fischer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine M JohnsonDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12262 University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School , Worcester, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-8139
Kathryn DelaneyDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12262 University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School , Worcester, MA, USA.
Melissa A FischerDepartment of Internal Medicine, 12262 University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School , Worcester, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to gain knowledge and ascertain challenges about periviability counseling among obstetricians to inform curricular development.

methodsFocus groups were utilized. A series of open-ended questions was posed to each group of obstetricians; responses were audio recorded and transcribed. Transcriptions were analyzed by two coders using thematic analysis.

resultsFour focus groups were convened. Prominent themes included: (1) Obstetrician knowledge about neonatal outcomes is limited, (2) Periviability counseling is both time intensive and time-challenged, (3) Patient processing of information relies on the content, delivery and patient readiness, and (4) Obstetrician bias is toward advocating for maternal safety, which may run counter to parental instinct to "do everything." The last theme was specifically focused on the role of cesarean delivery.

conclusionsCurricula focused on improving obstetrician periviability counseling should focus on neonatal outcomes, the role of cesarean delivery, and utilization of shared decision-making.

Indexed as

CounselingFocus GroupsObstetricsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCesarean SectionFemaleFetal ViabilityHumansMaleObstetriciansPregnancyQualitative Researchcurricular developmentfocus groupsobstetriciansperiviability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.