Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883982›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence in predicting all-cause mortality in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Faizus Sazzad, Ashlynn Ai Li Ler, Mohammad Shaheryar Furqan, Linus Kai Zhe Tan, Hwa Liang Leo, Ivandito Kuntjoro, Edgar Tay, Theo Kofidis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Machine learning for personalized risk assessment of HIV, syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Faizus SazzadDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ashlynn Ai Li LerDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Mohammad Shaheryar FurqanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Linus Kai Zhe TanDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Hwa Liang LeoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ivandito KuntjoroDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Edgar TayDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Theo KofidisDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: In recent years, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) models to generate individualised risk assessments and predict patient outcomes post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has been a topic of increasing relevance in literature. This study aims to evaluate the predictive accuracy of AI algorithms in forecasting post-TAVI mortality as compared to traditional risk scores. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) standard, a systematic review was carried out. We searched four databases in total-PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane-from 19 June 2023-24 June, 2023. Results: From 2,239 identified records, 1,504 duplicates were removed, 735 manuscripts were screened, and 10 studies were included in our review. Our pooled analysis of 5 studies and 9,398 patients revealed a significantly higher mean area under curve (AUC) associated with AI mortality predictions than traditional score predictions (MD: -0.16, CI: -0.22 to -0.10, Conclusion: AI models have a higher predictive accuracy as compared to traditional risk scores in predicting post-TAVI mortality. Overall, this review demonstrates the potential of AI in achieving personalised risk assessment in TAVI patients. Registration and protocol: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), under the registration name "All-Cause Mortality in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Assessed by Artificial Intelligence" and registration number CRD42023437705. A review protocol was not prepared. There were no amendments to the information provided at registration. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO (CRD42023437705).

Indexed as

aortic valve replacementartificial intelligencemachine learningmortalitysystematic reviewtranscathetertranscatheter aortic valve prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID38883982
PMCPMC11176615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.