Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38883961›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2024

Cost Analysis for Robotic and Open Gastrectomy.

Yuki Hirata, Heather G Lyu, Ahad M Azimuddin, Pamela Lu, Jeeva Ajith, Jason A Schmeisser, Elizabeth P Ninan, Kyung Hyun Lee, Brian D Badgwell, Paul Mansfield and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Short-Term Outcomes and Cost of Robotic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy During the Initial Phase of a Robotic Pancreatectomy Program.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuki HirataFrom the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Heather G LyuFrom the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ahad M AzimuddinFrom the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Pamela LuFrom the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jeeva AjithFinance, Analytics & Treasury, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jason A SchmeisserFinance, Analytics & Treasury, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Elizabeth P NinanDivision of Procedures and Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Kyung Hyun LeeCenter for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
Brian D BadgwellFrom the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Paul MansfieldFrom the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Naruhiko IkomaFrom the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine the magnitude of the perioperative costs associated with robotic gastrectomy (RG). Background: A robotic surgery platform has a high implementation cost and requires maintenance costs; however, whether the overall cost of RG, including all perioperative costs, is higher than conventional open gastrectomy (OG) remains unknown. Methods: Patients who underwent a major gastrectomy during February 2018 through December 2021 were retrospectively identified. We calculated the perioperative costs of RG and OG and compared them overall as well as in different phases, including intraoperative costs and 30-day postsurgery inpatient and outpatient costs. We investigated factors potentially associated with high cost and estimated the likelihood of RG to reduce overall cost under a Bayesian framework. All cost data were converted to ratios to the average cost of all operations performed at our center in year FY2021. Results: We identified 119 patients who underwent gastrectomy. The incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo >IIIa; RG, 10% vs OG, 13%) did not significantly differ between approaches. The median length of stay was 3 days shorter for RG versus OG (4 vs 7 days, Conclusions: Despite increased intraoperative costs, total perioperative costs in the RG group were similar to those in the OG group because of reduced postoperative hospitalization costs.

Identifiers

PMID38883961
PMCPMC11175903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.